communist

My point was that censorship is valid when it is to prevent harming individuals/fraud/bullying

my goalpost did not move at all.

you are being a hypocrite by saying it was okay not to have that on wikipedia because it was already banned

you should oppose that ban on the basis of censorship, no?

for the same reason they don't give resources to blatant harassment campaigns.

both are against the rules and both are censorship for nearly identical reasons

If I made a wikipedia page showing your social security and banking information would your stance hold true?

This is to stop a cyberbullying campaign against a disabled person

That kind of censorship doesn't sit will with me. What else are they keeping from us?

probably other things to harrass individuals with?

A democratic hoax to throw bill under the bus