eldavi

joined 2 years ago
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

If there was, it wasn't for very long

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

the difference here is the uyghur thing is american propaganda while the prison thing is reality.

there's plenty of other things that makes china look REALLY bad, but it's not the uyghurs since it's just the american pot calling the chinese kettle black and; even if it were 100% true; it's not anywhere near as bad american prosecution of SOOOO many groups.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago

if guess if they can make the slave trade endure for centuries, they can make anything happen. lol

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 11 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_States

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime ...

  • Amendment XIII, Section 1.
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

no sabo? lol

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

and any who try again are quizzed about their loyalty to isreal. eg mamdani

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

but they definitely had a moment. lol

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

all this is true, and i want to add they're also told that there are people that can fix things for them if they just believe in them and give them whatever they need to return to the "good old days"; in the united states; this is always a republican leader.

i think that this gives them hope for a brighter future and this hope makes them seem happier than others. they're fooled into having faith that things will eventually get better, so long as they keep showing up to vote for their "protector" (and they VERY MUCH reliably do) or else someone else with take charge who will then let those evil lgbt, poor, immigrants, etc. destroy the country. in the united states this someone else is always a democratic leader.

liberals have to find their own source of hope and; in the united states; most place it upon a democratic leader, but liberals see their leader less as a protector and more like a stop-gap or as someone who is a lesser evil. it doesn't matter than the democratic leader is virtually the same as the republican leader, it only matters that they're more socially progressive than the republican leader; even if only by a hair.

this means that the regressive policies that both the democratic and republican leaders share invariably bites a person in the ass where it either reinforces a conservative's faith in a protector or it disillusions a liberal. the liberal then, either rebuilds their broken sense of hope and invests it again into a new democratic leader or checks out of the system to become either a doomer and/or a non-voter.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

are you sure it's not a gaz floaty boy? lol

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

that does next to nothing to narrow it down. lol

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

a liberal in the united states is a centrist in the rest of the world.

a leftist in the united states is a liberal in the rest of the world.

the united states is MUCH more conservative that the rest of the world

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

who does this sort of propaganda?

view more: next ›