I sincerely apologize for taking you seriously. You tried to warn me with your alternating caps, so it's my fault. Cheers.
teawrecks
joined 2 years ago
That's fair, though that's more of a flaw with the email protocol. There's no way around leaking that to the receiver's email provider as well.
Good point, I hadn't considered that.
For the record, if your security is based on "trust", you're going to have a bad time. The whole point of a cryptographically secure line of communication is that you don't need to trust anyone except the recipient. Protonmail users choose it specifically because they don't trust anyone, including Protonmail.
The US economy is now completely detached from productivity and is now running on speculation
Yep, the market feels like it's in max-greed mode. There was a taste of fear when the tariffs were first announced, but wallst was quick to token TACO to justify just ignoring everything. My question for the last 9+ months has been, "how long can a market willingly ignore reality?"
I assume it will take until a critical mass of those speculators start needing to liquidate. I don't know what will trigger that, but at some point the profits come due.
All of that can be publicly audited. When we talk about "trust" we're referring to what happens server side, which we have to assume can never be publicly audited. The importance of e2e encryption is that what ever happens server side doesn't matter. There's a massive gulch between trusting a binary you're able to inspect and trusting one you can't.
What you said is valid though, if you want/need privacy, you need to put in effort, but you also have to assume there's someone smarter than you who will be able to outsmart your own audit. The absolute best you can hope for is that at least the binary is publicly reviewable and that they're not smarter than every pair of eyes who reviews it. That's basically the backbone of open source security.