vacuumflower

You probably should be busy in manual agricultural work then.

Since unions are about common interest and ideally orthogonal to ideology, I'll add that my subjective interest, as someone living in Russia, is that US tech workers were offshored and/or replaced by immigrants. Because that will long-term weaken the US as an aggressive nation, by losing qualifications.

At the same time if US tech unionized, that could mean weakening the incentive for that aggressive behavior, and weakening big companies.

Hard to decide really. Basically the only bad variant is if it's half-done, enough unionization to stabilize, but also not too much so that they'd still have enormous foreign labor resources. That would mean very powerful corporations and no change in politics.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 (Direct link to the GPL 2.0 license, since you likely don’t have the initiative to scroll 10% down the page)

It's very telling to even expect that someone here doesn't know what GPL is.

take the time to read and download The Cathedral and The Bazaar so you can read arguments for the current model that aren’t fresh from your ass

It's probable that I've been a Linux user and interested in it for longer than you, and I've read Raymond's thing at least 12 years ago. I've also read some counterarguments.

BTW, at this current point in time I'm again closer to the "bazaar" than to the "cathedral" side of the argument. And Linux isn't.

In general, having a text in support of something is not a final argument. Honestly it's weird to encounter it being used as such from someone who's likely literate more than in first generation.

I'm fine with arguments fresh from my ass if those are more than you can present. And that's how arguments among intelligent people work, FYI.

Oh and Caesar from Fallout: New Vegas called, he wants his misrepresentation of dialectics and philosophy back, you ignoramus prick.

It's unfortunate that your intelligence doesn't allow you to see how clumsy this is, to call someone names instead of, again, providing arguments.

and return to monkey

Yippikayee mothafocka

Oh. It’s you again. Good to see your shallow takes haven’t changed.

I don't remember you, but I get Dunning-Krueger vibes from things you write which seem to be typical "Linux as a success story" quotes without insight.

Can’t you have the foresight to actually read and research

I prefer to observe them in the wild. I mean, that is what's called research, but it strongly seems that you by research mean something else.

why things like the FOSS projects we rely on are validated? Linux is owned by no one, and is used by everyone who wants to.

This is as fallacious as "scientific communism" and for the same reason. Because there are dimensions of this where the general consensus of those actually applying resources is neutrality, where it works as you say, and there are dimensions where it's not.

Or you might read that Karl Popper's article on the blind zones of dialectics. Corporate participation in a big common open project works similarly to dialectics.

Corporate users are a feature, not a bug, and if anything, their adoption does more to cement the success of the project more than anything else.

Having a stronger Prussia did nothing of the sort for the HRE, and having Ustinov as minister of defense with all his power did nothing of the sort for the USSR, and Google did nothing of the sort for the Web.

But I prefer to live this through with many things today, rather than try to fix it to my limited ability.

People were doing complex surgeries, making fighter jets, submarines and spaceships without what you seem to call a computer.

Also I can't return to being an American because I've never been one.

And C64 is a computer, Radio-86RK is a computer, Amiga 500 is a very good computer.

Supersonic passenger planes have been built, before personal computers becoming anything common, but aren't operated today.

And you most likely don't live in a more than 60 story building, despite such being built.

And deliberately reducing your comfort is sometimes valuable, not everything should be entertainment.

Around year 1999. No particular reason, just it seems to have gained recognition and approval among the big fish then.

If by "when" you mean analytically, then when it stopped being "a hobby project started by a Finnish student with participation of volunteers from all around the world" and became one of the houses of power.

It's an enormous centralized project upon which much of the world depends.

And if you think you can find an intentionally put backdoor in a buttfuckazillion lines of code without even looking, purely by intuition or trusting some random security specialists from the news, then I think you've lost the way.

It's too complex and runs on too complex hardware. Honestly if we are going to look at any FOSS project with such hope, it should become a democracy first. A friendly reminder - Linux is a benevolent dictatorship, funded by corporations.

It is one thing. FreeBSD and NetBSD are not one thing. Linux is one thing.

And I meant Linux, not distributions and userlands, so you're the troll here.

Honestly the way Americans, and most of all educated and\or elitarian Americans, behave in society, - it makes perfect sense that at some point it will be sold. Nothing like it really in the world, with the UK as the close second.

It's still funny, Alaska was sold to the US because the Russian empire's expectation was for the US to eventually control all of the North American continent. Not even control, but settle first of all. Like with Texas, it's not very convenient when the main settling power is different from the one having theoretical control.

So honestly a meeting in Alaska would make the best sense as a prelude to selling Kamchatka to the US or something like that. It's kinda sobering that the US today (contrary even to 50 years ago) is not a society that can settle anything new.

And if we think about it, in the middle of the XIX century it was expected that the African continent will be settled by Europeans similarly to the Americas.

South American states preserved, despite all the crime and poverty and dictatorships, some degree of cultural diversity and even humanism, but don't look as attractive for immigrants as then. Let's say they were half-settled.

USA was half of the world's GDP at some point. It's not anymore.

The whole Africa was in population less than Europe. Settling it was plausible. Not anymore.

There were fewer Iranians on the planet than European Jews. Not anymore.

So I would say that, sacrificing Native Americans, the humanity has formed an immunity against European empires. It doesn't yet look so, but the numbers don't lie. And building combat drones en masse is honestly nothing that the non-imperial part of the world can't do. Actually the involved defense-related corruption is probably less everywhere else relevant than in the NATO countries.

Honestly I think we missed the moment when Linux went the wrong path too.