this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
621 points (98.3% liked)

196

5937 readers
1568 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Is capitalism really the problem here?

Is there another system that would bend straight bananas?

Or do we just force people to eat approved food. That sounds a bit shit if im honest.

[–] Sewerking@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The straightness of the bananas aren't the issue, it's the waste created by throwing out perfectly good bananas for not being purportedly aesthetically pleasing enough.

Nobody is forcing you to buy a straight banana, but you are being forced to have your only banana option be curved.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You seem to have missed my point.

Any solution requires all bananas to be consumed, including the less desirable ones.

You could produce less, but all produced nanas desirable or not need to be consumed lest they be wasted.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, it doesn’t need to be every banana, I imagine some are irredeemably damaged at some point during production or are so outside of banana norms that they look as though they may be spoiled.

Allowing a higher percentage of abnormal bananas to go to market would give people the option to buy them, but it wouldn’t remove their ability to buy normal bananas.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Allowing a higher percentage of abnormal bananas to go to market would give people the option to buy them, but it wouldn’t remove their ability to buy normal bananas.

The core of it is this:

You have a crop. The "pretty" ones get sold to supermarkets at the highest price (who in turn only want to buy the "pretty" ones because they sell best). The less pretty ones get sold to manufactured food companies, where the processing hides that they weren't "pretty" - diced veggies for canned vegetable soup, fruit purees, that kind of thing. There's not enough demand here to sell all the "ugly" ones. There's also online markets that sell "ugly" produce, like Misfits Market - they buy it cheaper than supermarkets and can resell cheaper than supermarkets as a result. Depending on the crop, some lower quality ones might get sold as animal feed. The rest is running out of people who want to buy it.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There's not enough demand here to sell all the "ugly" ones.

I’m not sure that you (and the banana merchants) are correct about this assumption. In this thread, there are many people who want to buy ugly produce, and not all want it at a reduced price.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If there were, the markets that specialize in "ugly" produce would do much, much better, have higher demand and buy up more of the produce to fill it.

That 40% is what's left after supermarkets buy all the "pretty" bananas they think they can sell, manufactured food companies buy up what they can use for stuff like purees, sliced banana going into various products, that sort of thing and "ugly" produce sellers (places like Misfits Market) buying up what they think they can sell. I don't think bananas are used in animal feed but for crops where that's a common use some of it gets sold for that. Broadly, each of these involves the farmer making less money per unit weight than the previous and selling less desirable product to each.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And yet people here are perfectly happy to eat ugly produce and expressing an unmet demand. The complaints about ugly produce markets here are all about spoiled or tasteless food, not appearance.

If banana farmers shipped 90% of the bananas they grew, they could reduce the share of their land dedicated to bananas and either broaden their repertoire of crops or allow the gained area to rewild.

Bananas are particularly sensitive to disease, so having borders of other crops would help prevent spread between banana plantations.

load more comments (6 replies)