this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
699 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

82956 readers
3369 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 41 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (23 children)
[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (11 children)

There's an anecdote that comes up in software about people working on missile software not caring about memory leaks because it's going to explode anyway before that becomes an issue.

Who cares about bugs in your software if it's a hobby project that's going to blow up anyway.

Also, including Claude doesn't inherently mean vibe coded, it can be for writing tests, small components, or debugging.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Using an LLM to write tests and small components is still vibe coding.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wikipedia says:

Vibe coding involves accepting AI-generated code without reviewing it,

If you are using LLMs to write e.g. small components, then you are typically understanding the structure of the program, and reviewing it.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There's nothing inherent to small components to suggest that you have to review them. If they're small, it's easier to tell yourself that the LLM probably got them right and you're justified in not checking.

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Bro, if I don't have to sit there for a half hour banging out code to map structure A on to structure B, I won't. I'll let someone else write it and spend 5 minutes to check that the code is clean and it works

[–] toad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Listen to me. I do code for a living. Nobody want to write HTML

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)