this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
164 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

11920 readers
609 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prime Minister Mark Carney and other Canadian prime ministers should be required to divest their investment portfolios when they assume office, not just put them in a blind trust, the House of Commons ethics committee recommends in a new report.

In its report made public Thursday morning, the committee said putting assets in a blind trust isn’t good enough, recommending instead "that the Government of Canada amend the Conflict of Interest Act that, for the application of subsection 27(1) the prime minister, as a reporting public office holder, is fully divested from their controlled assets through sale, since placement in a blind trust does not constitute true divestment."

The committee also wants the law amended to require public disclosure of "high-level holdings categories placed in a blind trust by reporting public office holders (sector/asset class, and whether the holdings are Canadian-market concentrated)," a recommendation that could shed new light on the financial interests of a number of top officials and cabinet ministers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 4 points 5 days ago (17 children)

Yes, why the fuck does a Prime Minister need additional investments while in office?

Its not like they will ever hurt for money again after they leave the position.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (16 children)

If you want successful people to hold office, you can't make them divest their portfolios and take capital gains tax hits that could ostensibly cost them more than their salary and pension combined.

I know I know "boo hoo rich people" but if you think that Mark Carney is a good PM, why would you then set up a pre-requisite that repels people like him from even considering taking the position?

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If the loss of assets is enough to prevent you from considering the position, I don't want you in that position. The PM is supposed to make decisions good for Canada, not their assets in particular.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)