this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
655 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

84110 readers
3059 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 42 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They didn't include this in the release notes? What in the world is going on?

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

From what I saw in a waterfox thread, it's not enabled, has no lists added or setup and is clearly early-stage.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's still a bit odd to deploy dormant code to non-testors, isn't it? Mozilla can withhold a Nightly or Beta feature for as long as it feels like, regardless of how many versions are released as they develop it.

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 18 hours ago

If there's no reason to hold the feature code back (i.e. its integration doesn't break anything), then it's much easier for development to ship the feature and disable it with a feature flag. Otherwise, you have two versions of the code, which means changes need to be integrated in both versions, which is largely just pointless busywork.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)