this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
54 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

42894 readers
265 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, there’s a piece in Jacobin arguing that data center moratoria are a “terrible idea” making the rounds on social media and beyond. It’s pretty easy to see why this makes for some good discourse; naturally, there’s going to be frisson among AI optimists when a perceived opponent—here, the nation’s most influential socialist magazine—makes a case for aligning with the tech industry’s goals.

While I’m pretty unconvinced on all but one or two of the points that the piece itself raises, and I think it seriously misconstrues the class politics of data center fights, I do think it’s worth litigating this idea. Because I do believe we should be thinking about what a broader and more engaged politics of resisting, regulating, and ultimately governing AI might look like. It’s a good occasion, in other words, to ask:

  • Who is fighting data centers?
  • Why are they fighting them?
  • Are anti-data center movements a dead end—or a starting point?
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hirundinidae@beehaw.org 11 points 4 days ago (6 children)

As others have pointed out, moratoria like the one Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have proposed are designed to buy time to work questions like that out—to develop good governance and regulation of AI—not install a permanent ban.

It's impossible to totally ban it since these models can be run locally. Anyway I think if we're going to allow people to make AI slop and consume absurd amounts of electricity then there needs to be some guardrails put in place. Premium utility tax for electricity consumed (also apply this to crypto), watermarks for AI content, priority for renewables in new grid power, provisions for noise pollution. All of it.

But like the article points out, what we need here is time and the tech overlords just don't want to give us that.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Watermarks for AI content is a non-starter, there's no possible way to enforce this. Pandora's box has been opened, and even if you mandated all the big AI companies do it, the open source models that exist (or will be developed) will be available to bypass it.

Nothing wrong with charging actual costs for electricity or expanding the grid with renewables. These are actually relevant ideas.

Noise pollution? I haven't heard that one before. As long as the data centers aren't running generators, the noise from them should be lower than almost any other industrial user.

[–] Hirundinidae@beehaw.org 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They tend to have a massive amount of cooling units on top, which does create a lot of noise. There are also instances of the companies using portable diesel and even turbine generators to power their data centers, which has got to be infuriating to live near.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

which can be heard for hundreds of feet around them

From that linked article.

Hundreds of feet!

They aren't building these 50 feet from residential properties. I don't think this is an actual issue.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

Let me introduce you to Benn Jordan

Datacenters Behaving Like Acoustic Weapons

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bP80DEAbuo

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)