this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
170 points (96.7% liked)

politics

25887 readers
2817 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm chronically online, very progressive, and pretty in the weeds with politics. The only reason I know Ken Martin's name is the story about him vs David Hogg.

Hogg's message of removing ineffective democrats and fighting for progressive causes seems good to me.

What is Ken's value proposition? I tried googling to see his platform or what he's accomplished, and all I can find are articles about Hogg or him getting elected.

Is he the one sending Bernie/AOC out to fix relationships with red voters?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Hogg’s message of removing ineffective democrats and fighting for progressive causes seems good to me.

And Ken agrees it needs done and is taking action that will result in that...

Because he knows that's what will increase dem turnout.

It's just he believes "the party" as an entity shouldn't have any bias at all on the candidates. So a vice-chair should never be saying "____ needs primaries" even if everyone at the DNC agrees.

Thats not the job of the DNC as Ken sees it, and he's right

The largest problem with the DNC for decades has been what Hogg wanted to do, because it's what neoli erals have been doing Hogg's entire life. He's never had a DNC doing it's actually job.

Is he the one sending Bernie/AOC out to fix relationships with red voters?

Since 2016 the "victory fund" bankrupted state parties. Allowing Republicans to capture the house. All that money went to DNC and Hillary/Biden/Harris

We're 8 months deep in the largest redistribution of funds from DNC to state parties. With extra money going to red/purple states where we can pick up seats.

Those red/purple states now have the money to host Bernie/AOC, and do other stuff they couldn't afford to do during campaigns, let alone a year out from an election.

They're literally all staffed up at campaign levels already

It's a bottom-up structure, which is how the Dem party was meant to be.