this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
116 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
1032 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As OpenAI files SEC paperwork ahead of an expected initial public stock offering, newly leaked financial documents show a company with quickly growing revenues that are currently being overwhelmed by even larger expenses.

The audited financial statements, obtained by independent journalist Ed Zitron, show OpenAI’s reported revenue growing from $3.7 billion in 2024 to $13.07 billion in 2025. The Financial Times, which reviewed the same documents, writes that the company’s monthly revenues had grown to nearly $2 billion by the end of 2025, suggesting that its ongoing revenue rates continued to grow throughout the year.

But the company’s fast-growing revenues are still dwarfed by its even more significant expenses. OpenAI’s total revenues in both of the last two years were outpaced by research and development alone, which grew from a $7.81 billion line item in 2024 to a massive $19.18 billion cost in 2025. Those numbers seem to reflect the significant costs OpenAI incurred in training new models and include $10.59 billion in R&D costs paid to Microslop alone in 2025.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

How can you loss any money when you don't have any to start with?

[–] flyingsaucerhat@fedinsfw.app 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It’s simple; you lose other people’s money

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 minutes ago

And with the IPO they're trying to sell of to a bunch of bagholders so it stops being their problem

load more comments (3 replies)