politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
You are, at the end of the day, a tragically broken person who clings to fantasy like it’s a safety blanket. You wrap yourself in these cheap little conspiracy scripts because it’s easier than doing the hard work of actually thinking. And that’s the core of it: it’s lazy. Weak. You don’t engage with facts, you don’t engage with rigor, you just pull the lever marked “mystery explanation” and out comes some recycled nonsense.
You know you’re in the wrong, but you persist anyway, because admitting that you’re just flailing at shadows would mean actually confronting the gaps in your own reasoning. And that takes effort. That takes discipline. Instead, you play make-believe and then act like you’ve scored points by announcing, for the fiftieth time, that “everything’s a cover-up.”
Stop spewing this drivel and maybe, just maybe, people wouldn’t have to waste their time walking you through the obvious. The only reason this conversation has gone this far is because you keep doubling down on nonsense instead of doing the grown-up thing: pausing, reflecting, and bringing some actual rigor to your thinking. Until then, you’ll stay exactly where you are now, stuck in the shallow end, paddling in circles, convinced you’ve discovered the ocean.
Just "pretending" to have an upper hand doesn't give you that.
Blah blah blah. Didn't skim anything to indicate you've read anything other than a thesaurus. Boring.
Prove you know something, anything relevant. Network architecture, firmware development, pentesting, anything. I'm losing interest faster than your wife Krieger.
You are the only one in this conversation owing of proof. And your "interest" is like your opinion and intellect: of precisely 0 value. Just a sealioning bit of effluent who shouldn't have an opinion in the first place. But because I'm so gracious, and willing to engage an inferior creature like yourself (which you should feel incredibly thankful for), here is a figure I'm working on for an update to a project (which was entirely my own theoretical contribution) that impacted the lives of almost 40 million people (and really, hundreds of millions more because of follow-on decisions based on my work), through my intellect alone.
Figure 1
Figure 2
You are just a sad, projective, broken mind. Because you obviously didn't seem to notice this was entirely performative; its goal was to put you on display. And thankfully, you did all of the convincing to our audience I needed you to. Now no one will believe you or take you seriously, and it was something you did to yourself.
The fact is you are just a little person who, because probably you don't have any real self worth, make the assumption others must feel as little and small as you do.
Didn't expect to goad you into doxing yourself. I'm genuinely bored though. You don't have any relevant knowledge, maybe an ag or bio degree if those images are from your own work lol.
Thanks for the chuckle🫡
There is one self evident clown here, and its been you the whole time. Go check the up/ downs for community sentiment on this thread.
Boring