this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
621 points (99.7% liked)

Fuck AI

8153 readers
2192 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A professor used white font to hide instructions to throw off students using an AI chatbot to cheat on their midterm.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (22 children)

The midterm, by the way, was about the Industrial Revolution.

I get it, you spent a fortune on this class so you could have a job that will allow you to maybe retire someday. You don't even give a shit about this class or the material, you don't care about history and you just needed the credit. It has literally nothing to do with any of the jobs you might get in the future, if you learn nothing it won't make a difference. If you study and try your best you still might not actually get a good grade. The temptation to cheat would be hard to resist.

All AI has done is reveal a deeper problem with college - students aren't there to learn, they're there to be credentialed.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

In University I would hope most people in the class are there because they DO have an interest. On the other hand, if I could have cheated on organic chemistry like this, I probably would have.

On the other, other hand, we would copy eachothers work, but at least we'd change it enough so that it wouldn't be obvious. It's not that the new generation cheats more, it's that they're bad at it.

Also, we didn't write a lot of paragraphs of text in chemistry, so maybe my experience is skewed there too

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if you don't mind, what field are you in that you were examined in ochem but you don't use ochem? last time i've checked, chatbots crap the bed constantly when asked about anything that you can deduce (easily, by analogy) but can't find, especially as text, the mistakes were either glaring or sneaky but never correct. it's much easier to express what you mean by drawings in ochem anyway

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My last ochem was during my bachelor's, which is a painfully long time ago. Everyone had to take it. Did my masters and PhD in crystals and materials, before realizing I never wanted to do anything in academia ever again.

Now I work in workplace safety and hazardous materials handling and regulation. Which is all very chemistry-related, but involves almost no actual chemistry. So I guess it's a bit of a copout. I'm relatively sure I could still do anything related to materials science without organic chemistry though.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fair. I'm doing synthetic chemistry for a living, and probably i have as much use of electrochemistry or crystallography as you do have of organic chemistry. I get it is a skill with a limited utility, and i might be biased, but i don't get why people complain about it so much. On the other hand, one of my labmates was hired by mat sci lab as a single person fire brigade to unfuck their project, ant it worked despite no organic chemistry involvement

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)