this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
44 points (97.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33977 readers
2598 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

People don't know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols

[–] na_th_an@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

If you read it aloud it doesn't sound right, but from a mathematical perspective it's saying the number of steps per day should be less than 500, which I think is the intention of the writer, no?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

500 greater then steps per day

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

500 > steps_per_day

Unfortunately I don't think we have enough information to solve for steps_per_day , though I assume it is also >= 0 .

So we can make an educated guess that

500 > steps_per_day >= 0

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

That’s if you interpret the text as being part of the equation

[–] xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't tell if an Excel enthusiast or a palindrome aficionado. 🤔

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes that's the intention but they got the order wrong, it would make more sense if it was written as ateps/day < 500

It's so wrong it underflowed into somehow being right again.

Unusual? Sure. Mathematically? Right.

People don't know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols

It’s correctly used in the text.

Number of steps < 500 is equivalent to 500 > number of steps.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope, it's wrong lol

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a bit weird, but imo not wrong. 500 > steps/day or steps/day < 500 is the same. As long as the big end of the < or > is at the 500 it makes sense. It only doesn't make sense if you literally read 500 > steps/day as "five hundred greater than steps a day" instead of parsing it as math.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Only reason it's so jarring is the context has people parsing the whole list as language and they weren't expecting to have to abruptly parse a mathematical expression.