this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
42 points (97.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33977 readers
2183 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Sounds miserable no thanks.

[–] BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I think the steps are the only challenge. Just going to the bathroom accrudes 1000 steps sometimes

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

It should be <500 or what they said. What they said is mathematically better but grammatically wonky, whereas what you said is 500 is less than steps per day.

Big number > small number < big number

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

I did that one day. Does it count?

[–] cmeu@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I've been training for this my whole life

[–] Vile_port_aloo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Completed it

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

People don't know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols

[–] na_th_an@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

If you read it aloud it doesn't sound right, but from a mathematical perspective it's saying the number of steps per day should be less than 500, which I think is the intention of the writer, no?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

500 greater then steps per day

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

500 > steps_per_day

Unfortunately I don't think we have enough information to solve for steps_per_day , though I assume it is also >= 0 .

So we can make an educated guess that

500 > steps_per_day >= 0

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That’s if you interpret the text as being part of the equation

[–] xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't tell if an Excel enthusiast or a palindrome aficionado. 🤔

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes that's the intention but they got the order wrong, it would make more sense if it was written as ateps/day < 500

It's so wrong it underflowed into somehow being right again.

Unusual? Sure. Mathematically? Right.

People don't know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols

It’s correctly used in the text.

Number of steps < 500 is equivalent to 500 > number of steps.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

such as yourself you mean?

Nope, it's wrong lol

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a bit weird, but imo not wrong. 500 > steps/day or steps/day < 500 is the same. As long as the big end of the < or > is at the 500 it makes sense. It only doesn't make sense if you literally read 500 > steps/day as "five hundred greater than steps a day" instead of parsing it as math.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Only reason it's so jarring is the context has people parsing the whole list as language and they weren't expecting to have to abruptly parse a mathematical expression.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Was with you until no home cooked meals. Takeaways cost more than I spend on food for a week and I can make better food.

Make it buy a kg of every flavour of sausage at the butchers and eat them all over the month and the challenge works out a lot cheaper and tastier.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah but you'll also be eating sausage for every meal of every day for that entire month.

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

It's gonna fit right in with the alcohol

[–] Laser@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

That's what makes it a challenge

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

500 greater than steps per day

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

aka steps per day less than 500

I don't get why people have a problem with this

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah so I did the math. 500 is supposed greater than your number of steps per day.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound very healthy physically. But mentally? Yes!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

That's the trick though, especially as you get older. The stuff that sounds like an awesome relaxing reset and will surely be nice at the time, is not always the activity that will actually leave you feeling better afterwards.

A frustrating example is being tired in the middle of the day on a weekend when I wanted to be productive in my hobbies & house work. If I take a nap, will that save me evening or ruin my evening?

There's a lot of trial and error, since we're all different.

[–] Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Challenge? Bro this is just life

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

I do believe that is the joke.

[–] Alenalda@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Takeout every day? Your monthly food bills gotta be over 1k

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

One Chipotle bowl could be two of my meals, just to be fair. That's $12 there. Add a cheeseburger or nuggets on a cheap menu and we are talking about $20 per day. 20 * 30 = $600, so still a lot.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hmm...

  • Daily porn actually gets boring. Porn will start to become "normal" and so you'll get desensitised. Why would I want to desensitise myself from porn?
  • No thank you. I like the occasional cocktail, but alcohol every day!? Ew no.
  • I already do this. :)
  • I get 8 hours sleep minimum. Can't get less. I'll die.
  • My job involves biking... That's technically not taking steps.
  • I already don't do this.
  • That's too bloody expensive! You think I have a tree that grows money!?
[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More than, 500 steps a day!? What do you think I am--active?

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

While it did use the greater-than symbol, it was arranged unconventionally. The way it's written is "500 is greater than steps per day," meaning don't walk too much, which fits with the rest of the author's theme.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No. Steps/day is the unit. They used the symbol incorrectly

[–] f314@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s not how that works, though… It is 100 % what they meant, but not at all how you use greater than/less than signs in text.

[–] wieson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You do......?

Let n be the number of steps

500 > n >= 0
For example

[–] f314@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Sure, I might have worded myself a bit clumsily. I meant using them in a conversational way. They’re trying to say “less than 500 steps,” which is very different from “500 is larger than steps per day” in tone.

My point was just that in normal speech and writing you would say “less than 500”, which would be written “< 500” if you insisted on using the mathematical sign.