this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
86 points (93.0% liked)

Selfhosted

62990 readers
1233 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've had several occasions in my life where I've tried to switch to Linux only to run into hardware incompatibilities that would have taken me man-months to solve. Thanks to GPT my primary personal PC, home media and project server is now running Linux and fully functional. I've got Jellyfin, NextCloud, Navidrome and Joplin all happy. I've also been able to wipe an obsolete MacOS off my 2017-era Macbook Pro and it's happily running Mint.

There's a deep irony in Windows being enshittified by AI, while the same AI makes Linux about a billion times more usable. Now I have a leftover Windows micro-PC running a local LLM model, so I can be less dependent on GPT, as long as time isn't a factor...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kyrias@lemmy.ca 49 points 5 hours ago (10 children)

Yeah. I'm not pro-AI by any stretch but internet searching powered by AI has made it MUCH easier to tinker and troubleshoot. The Linux community can be pretty awful when you're new to Linux and trying to make things run.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 hours ago (8 children)

Just RTFM!!!!

*reads the manual and there’s nothing about this*

…ok. Now what?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Sorry, that guide was written for systems running systemd and the install manual you followed was a from an opinionated Arch user for SysVinit.

Oh, this guide is 11 years old written by someone who hated Wayland, so no, modern KDE won’t work with it.

Just use Arch Wiki, it’s the best for beginners, but also don’t install Arch unless you know what you’re doing already because it’s the worst for beginners.

[–] trojanbark@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, any time someone tells me to just read the arch wiki for something unrelated to arch I automatically know they will never provide anything valuable to humanity

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago)

I have made the completely opposite experience. I tried so many distros and every single time some non-trivial issues came up my search ended in the arch wiki finally explaining stuff and writing out available options in config files instead of just telling my what option in what GUI config tool (that might or might not exist in my distro) I should click, then pray it works (felt very alike to windows actually where you get two dozen guides to solve a problem, each one editing another obscure registry key and trying to find the one actually working with the current version).

So I wasted years listening to the "No, Archlinux is a meme and totally unusable for inexperienced people" before installing archlinux, which is now running for more than 9 years without problems, and will happily point people asking questions for other distros to the relevant parts of the arch wiki that actually spell stuff out properly.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago

Archwiki is pretty good, it has a lot of breadth, but it’s not a manual and it’s not easy.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)