this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
204 points (99.0% liked)

politics

25238 readers
2704 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure Trump got a mouth full though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

The news in Europe are that he was submissive of Putin in an unusual manner.

That said, it could be a diplomatic move just like NATO secretary general called Trump 'daddy' to stroke his ego

Trump is left with a long nose'

This is the analysis from Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard, a senior researcher in American foreign policy at the Danish Institute for International Studies, on the back of the meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.

  • All things being equal, this is a pretty big victory for Putin. That he got the meeting, but also that he was allowed to leave the meeting without having made any concessions - at least publicly.
  • On the other hand, you can just say that Donald Trump is left with a long nose. He didn't get the deal he said he wanted, says Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard, referring to Trump's hope for a temporary ceasefire.

[–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Nytimes says basically the same: “In fact, it would be hard to imagine an event that could have gone better from the point of view of the Russian leader, who made no public commitment to stop his assault on Ukraine and yet was treated as a valued friend. Mr. Trump did not fault Mr. Putin for starting the brutal war and left without mentioning the sanctions that just hours earlier he had threatened to impose if there were no deal.”

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 hours ago

I mean, unless he's in a union, Trump is Putin's direct report and wouldn't be professional to dictate terms to his superior.

Fascist followers will do anything except form a union.