this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
167 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

74073 readers
3112 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 23 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Most car for the last decade or two already come with a lot of options built-in that are simply disabled by software in the factory. It's cheaper to just build in a standard set of electronics and disable what's not bought by the customer because many brands still like to milk the customer with options. Subscriptions just take the buying of options to renting.

VW here also also has the "lifetime subscription" for this. That makes it basically the same as you buying the option and they switch in it on in the factory. It's just plain in your face that it's behind a paywall while the old checking options didn't feel as much as a paywall.

Anyway, I went with Hyundai. They didn't do options and subscriptions. You only get to choose the model and looks, that's it.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Well hyundai has a predefined trim system, they cut cost of manufacturing by only having predefined trim levels that you can't customize.

They might still do this cutting of horsepower but they do it because of batteries.

e.g. the 39kwh and the 64 kwh Kona has the same motor but on the 39kwh it's limited as the battery pack can't deliver enough juice.

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck “lifetime subscriptions”. They’re taking a page from Tesla and I’m sure they’ll require any new owner to pay them separately should you sell the vehicle.

Simply avoid VW and any future brand that pulls this shit.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

Tesla does not and has never had "lifetime subscriptions". They have a single connectivity subscription (they still have basic connectivity for free for all cars that allows you to monitor and control the vehicle,as well as navigation). Any other upgrades are behind 1-time payments (or your choice of either).

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Wouldn't it be even cheaper to design the next version modularly and interchangeable?

Ah, wait, that would make it too easy to repair for unlicensed users.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Wouldn't it be even cheaper to design the next version modularly and interchangeable?

The extra labor to manage more components and check/verify each single vehicle fits it's unique specs would eat up the saving really fast. It's so much easier to do a single HW config and manage it through SW, and electronic components are generally cheap.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 5 points 9 hours ago

That would require more logistics to get different modules, checks to make sure the right ones are installed and labor to install them. Somewhere there is a cutoff point where modularity is cheaper.