this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
1070 points (95.0% liked)

Political Memes

9945 readers
1615 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Far left is: "We're going to destroy the very concept of private ownership and wealth accumulation"

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (16 children)

"... to meet everyone's basic needs"

[–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (32 children)

"..."
"To meet everyone's basic needs, right?"

/AnakinAndPadmeMeme.jpg

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] Kamsaa@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way I see it, between left and far left the direction is roughly the same, that's the means and end point that differ (i.e. revolution or not and how far we go into sharing resources). This is an important difference and they should thus not be mixed.

[–] marx@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Also needs to be a clear distinction between democratic left and authoritarian left.

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (8 children)

In a naive attempt to "meet everyone’s basic needs" sure, but in practice it would almost certainly end up enriching and entrenching a new ruling class, or collapsing under external pressure even if there are some early wins.

Many things sound simple from the outset. But tearing down and rebuilding an entire society isn’t something you do without significant (and often lethal) force and with plenty of intended and unintended casualties along the way (and there’s still a very good chance we'd screw it up).

If it's not "the good guys" wielding overwhelming force, it’ll be "the bad guys" stepping in. Every political system ultimately rests on the realistic threat/application of force; the only question is who controls it and how accountable they are.

I'm not inclined to trust anyone waving guns in my face, nor encourage situations that make that more likely. So, things would have to get a lot worse for me (and I'd venture most people) to want violent overthrow of my current (far from perfect) political and social system. That said ... at some point, for many people in many countries, it may be too late. Apathy isn't appropriate either.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You always have this problem if you have people with concentrated power aka a “ruling class”

Only way to prevent this is transparency and tools that the people of country can control the ruling class

Very important for such a setup is, that politics, media, law enforcement and courts are separated and controlling each other

And that private companies are not allowed to fuck with the system

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I couldn't agree more. Although I'll add that education and basic health/social support is also needed for long term stability, or large swathes of the population will be manipulated by fear and dis/misinformation, and will likely end up voting against their own interests. Social cohesion is important, which is why it is used as a weapon by nation states and other political actors.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 22 hours ago

Absolutely agree 🙏🏻

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You guys are talking about basic capitalism, right? You all understand that, don't you?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] FluxUniversity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

typical

We're talking about the ultra wealthy sharing the stockpiles of resources they have stolen and enslaved to gather, and the first spin is that they "aren't allowed to have private things" and "we aren't allowed to accumulate wealth"

eat shit

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, this thread is full of people who have lived their lives under absolute capitalist doctrine and cannot see an alternative and have never considered the underlying philosophy and morality of that system and can't even imagine another, so they backfill the blanks and rationalize what they have so they don't have to deal with actually thinking about it deeper because that would require effort and discomfort.

Politicalmemes? Yep, another right wing breeding ground, it always is.

[–] FluxUniversity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago

Its horrible! Where can I go on lemmy thats free of this? Where can I go across the internet?