this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
543 points (88.8% liked)

Memes

53346 readers
724 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zabjam@feddit.org -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Sure buddy. It is still irrelevant. It is not hypocritical to ciritice a source. You don't have to prove a different point to bring forward criticism. The only question should be "is the criticism valid?" And not "do you have a better point?"

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And the answer to that question is "there’s no such thing as a source with no bias"

[–] Zabjam@feddit.org -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No it is not. That's only an answer if one thinks that every sources bias is as bad as any other, which was rejected earlier as "outrages strawman". Under the assumption that sources can be more or less biased, it is worth questioning the bias and the statement "there's no such thing as a source with no bias" is a moot point.