this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
377 points (99.5% liked)
Funny
12484 readers
1451 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The amendment was actually added at the insistence of slaver states to ensure they would have well armed militias to hunt down escaped slaves and put down any slave rebellions.
Then why'd they add "being necessary to the security of a free State"?
Idk if the other guy is right, but it's not like they would add "to hunt down slaves" instead. So they might have put that to get the whole thing added on.
Right, but if the only way the slavers could get it in was to say it's for rebelling against tyranny, then it seems like rebelling against tyranny was the important concern.
Also I've read the declaration of secession by the confederate states and it was really explicit about slavery being the point. I think they would say it's for slavery if they thought they could get away with it