this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
962 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

8729 readers
1507 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm glad I wasn't Disney'd in childhood. Better to know reality, than be deluded, made fragile and crippled by reality. Face the horror. Stop lying to children. Children become adults.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 28 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Grow up on a farm and you really have no delusions about how the world works. Although I did think teachers lived at the school so I was unclear with how Mrs Thatcher got pregnant.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

how Mrs Thatcher got pregnant

Presumably, alcohol involved.

Although, that too likely still naive.

... The perversions in the crooked cabal... they're into a lot of really really vile stuff.

[Edit: Oh... or are you talking about a different Mrs Thatcher than Thatcher pulling the strings... or grabbing buns or babies or something.  Scary ugly lady, with scary gesticulation.?]

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Presumably, alcohol involved.

Oh we love you Mrs Thatcher, like your old man likes a brew;

such a lad your husband Denis when he's had a drink or two.

Sure he'll take a pint of Murphy's and a glass of Irish Mist

and because he sleeps with you each night, no wonder he's always pissed.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it was a different Mrs Thatcher, and to be clear that might not have been her actual name, I'm just coming up with something that sounds appropriately similar. I've subsequently seen pictures of her in the class yearbook. She was really really hot, when she was my teacher she was younger than I am now so I absolutely did not appreciate her attractiveness.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

She was really really hot,

Yeah. Very certainly a different Mrs Thatcher than the UK's Prime Minister through the 1980s.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There were a lot of teachers that were married, and that in itself didn't make sense to me. Not because I thought they lived at school, but because they had such awful attitudes that I couldn't imagine somebody agreeing to spend their entire lives with them.

Then I grew up and realized that their husbands were probably awful, too. Either that, or the teachers took all their frustrations out on their students and had happier home lives. Either way, I still find it pretty sad. I know patience is a virtue, but you should know what you're getting into when you choose to become a teacher. Shitty teachers create traumatized students. If you don't think you can hack it, please, for the sake of all that is good, consider a different career.

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i dont think you know what teachers go through. elementary teachers get physically assaulted by their students and then get blamed by admin AND parents. teachers dont have shitty attitudes from their home life, they have it because they are exploited yet held to impossible standards.

one teacher i know, quit her job after some fifth grade students showed her a print of her house on google maps, said they know where she lives and were gonna go there and rape and kill her daughter. she ended up in inpatient psychiatric care from this job. the kids in question were not expelled and nothing was done.

Things have definitely escalated today. We didn't have Google maps and other instant-stalking technology when I went to elementary school. Columbine and school shootings hadn't been a thing yet either (though they would be, later on in my school years.) A lot of modern teacher stresses aren't applicable to a critique of the elementary school teachers that I had.

Also, I teach kids, specifically special needs students. Violent outbursts aren't uncommon, we even have blocking pads for those situations. One of my coworkers got a concussion this summer in spite of it. I know it isn't easy, but I also knew what I was getting into.

It's one thing to do the best with the situation you're dealt, but it's something else to lose your cool and take it out on your students. If I were ever to feel my spark for teaching start to fade, or a resentment of children set in, I'd move onto a different job. That wouldn't be easy either, but it'd be a hell of a lot more ethical.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh no she was wonderful, we got to hear all the hot gossip from her. None of the teachers liked Mrs Hall, she was the antichrist apparently. Even as a kid I could tell she hated children. God knows why she became a teacher.

Meanwhile Mrs Thatcher had a rabbit, a classroom pet. Oh it was wonderful, I'm not sure I necessarily learnt all that much from her, but I really liked her.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I mean you grew up believing that it's healthier to eat meat rather than just more profitable to sell it, or that it is morally defensible in any way to create an intelligent creature and then force it into a state of utter lifelong dependency just so that you can exploit its biological processes, so I wouldn't be so sure about that "no delusions" thing. You're on your own supply.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

it is morally defensible ... to ... exploit ...biological processes

and I won't pretend it's not

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

that it is morally defensible in any way to create an intelligent creature and then force it into a state of utter lifelong dependency just so that you can exploit its biological processes

Interestingly, I don't have issue with people who hunt for meat (provided they follow generally accepted responsible hunting practices), but I have a big fucking issue with animal agriculture.

The quoted section is the distinguishing factor. Creating sentient life for the explicit purpose of exploiting it really rubs me the wrong way.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Humans are part of nature too, and we have our animal instincts same as any other animal. Only thing that differs is our capacity to self-reflect and exercise agency over our place in the ecosystem. What matters is that we have respect for life and don't take it for granted. I agree that factory farms, hunting for sport or luxury goods like furs, etc. is wrong, but I don't see a problem with a small farm raising some animals as long as they're treated with respect and given a comfortable life. All animals - including us - are dependent on others for survival.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The mother of the last pig you ate was perfectly capable of raising her own young. But a farmer took that ability from her by locking her in a cage that was so fucking small, she could not even turn around or roll over. That's how a fucking farmer "raises" a fucking piglet. Enrichment? Meeting emotional needs? Basic medical attention for injuries? No. You are put in a cage so small you cannot move, until you die.

The lies you tell yourself are disgusting. Keep them to yourself.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

you don't actually know any of that. your guessing.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Humans are part of nature too

Meaningless appeal to nature. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature

No one who breeds, murders, and butchers animals (or who pays to have those things done) has respect for life. You are lying to yourself so that you don't have to see yourself as a bad person. There is a better way not to see yourself as a bad person.

Farms do not "raise" animals. When you raise a child, you prepare it for life. A farm animal does not go on to enjoy life, they are killed in their absolute prime, because that is when the product is at its best. It's absurd that these lies are convincing to you, but we are eager to believe certain lies, aren't we?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

it's not being used fallaciously

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

You kidding me? I only eat meat because it is cooked, and is what is available. I tried to secretly go vegan.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean you grew up believing that it's healthier to eat meat rather than just more profitable to sell it

Seriously I've read this about 10 times and I still have no idea what you're going on about. It's healthier to eat meat than sell it, what?

it is morally defensible in any way to create an intelligent creature

What absolute grammar hellhole is this? What animal are you thinking of?

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

It's honestly not that hard, but you still managed to get it exactly backwards. Maybe with that hint you'll finally figure it out.