this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
263 points (95.5% liked)
Greentext
7465 readers
1092 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
[lady for lady in ladies if lady.is_single]just doesn't have the same bop.Can I just say that as someone who only codes tangentially to my work, code and documentation that uses the same word 2 or 3 times in an expression, when they mean different things, is such an immense pet peeve of mine when learning something new.
I'm already struggling with everything else about it, and now I have to parse out which lady is which and what the hell each one is supposed to be
object Object(object = object);
Statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged.
All the lady in there are the same lady, it's being used for different things as the other comment answered you but it's the same box of information, if you will.
That's just Python's generator syntax. Not all that difficult to parse once you get a feel for it. Plus syntax highlighting helps.
it's list comprehension syntax, not generator syntax
list comprehensions aren't changed much. but a statement like
dog = Dog(name="fido")is transpiled tothe dog is now a Dog with name 'fido'the language uses backticks for strings. it handles nested stringly nicely because of it