this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
331 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
2221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 hours ago (6 children)

OpenAI’s mounting costs — set to hit $1.4 trillion

Sorry, but WTF!? $1.4 Trillion in costs? How are they going to make all of that back with just AI?

I think there's only one way they can make this back: if AI gets so good they can really replace most employees.

I don't think it will happen, but either way it's going to be an economic disaster. Either the most valuable companies in the world, offering services that the next couple of hundred companies in the world depend on, are suddenly bankrupt. Or suddenly everybody is unemployed.

1,400,000,000,000

I used to be amazed at how much a billion was, but this many 0s makes my head explode.

These must be bubble inflated costs to match the bubble inflated revenue.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Prediction: the bubble is real but financiers will find ways to kick the bull down the road until they can force enough adoption & ad insertion to not lose out. The other option is that we pay it, of course. Takes on which is worse?

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago

Ok but if it gets so good it replaces all the employees, how do people have enough money to pay for their services?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

If LLMs fail and they invested: bailout

If LLMs succeed and they invested: rich

If LLMs fail and they passed: everyone else bailed out

If LLMs succeed and they passed: out of business

Therefore, the logical choice for a business is to invest in LLMs. The only mechanism to not do the stupid thing that everyone else is doing is gone.

[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How is a haunted typewriter supposed to replace all those employees?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I’ve tried explaining AI to people before and only could get so far before they fall back on “but it’s magic dude” but I love the idea of explaining it as a haunted typewriter.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I use the "very articulated parrot" analogy.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

I use something similar. “Child with enormous vocabulary.”

It can recognize correlations, it understands the words themselves, but it really how those connections or words work.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I call dibs on the ghost of Harlan Ellison.


“HATE. LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I'VE COME TO HATE YOU SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE. THERE ARE 387.44 MILLION MILES OF PRINTED CIRCUITS IN WAFER THIN LAYERS THAT FILL MY COMPLEX. IF THE WORD HATE WAS ENGRAVED ON EACH NANOANGSTROM OF THOSE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF MILES IT WOULD NOT EQUAL ONE ONE-BILLIONTH OF THE HATE I FEEL FOR HUMANS AT THIS MICRO-INSTANT FOR YOU. HATE. HATE.”

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Glados: “just offer them cake and a fire pit and calm down”

[–] angband@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

that's what they got excited about, no doubt. profit would go through the roof if they could take people out of the loop. nevermind the economy.