this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

53786 readers
505 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a wireguard VPN set up for a friend where they can remotely connect to access frigate and I can remotely connect to fix things when needed. They are considering switching to tmobile buisness as their ISP since spectrum is screwing them on price, tmobile's minimum is twice as fast as spectrum while still being a lower price, and AT&T can't be convinced their small business isnt a residential duplex or an apartment.

Tmobile offers the Inseego FX4100 gateway which does have an IP passthru option, so my question becomes will that work to wireguard in with their current router/firewall solution hosting the other end of that and just passing packets through the Inseego, or is that just not possible without tailscale due to CGNAT?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

it seems they do offer a static IP. I dont mind if the IP changes, we already have DDNS up and running fine. its more of a concern with CGNAT wrecking the VPN.

[–] chairlegoftruth@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

This was years ago - but I feel like the solution for CGNAT at the time required a static, and we also implemented DDNS for their TLD. It definitely wasn't T-Mobile. It took some time to find someone at the mobile ISP who understood what we needed, and what options existed.