this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
446 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

77814 readers
2407 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Tali Roth, the then product manager working on the core Windows user experience, including the Start menu, taskbar, and notifications, took up the question and talked about how building the taskbar from scratch meant that they had to cherry-pick things to put into the feature list first, and the ability to move the taskbar didn’t make the cut, for several reasons that Microsoft values.

WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?!

If you have working code, why would you rewrite it from scratch? Refactor, sure. Overhaul, maybe. But why rewrite the whole thing?! You're gaining nothing but unnecessary bugs.

I know all the joke answers. To justify a product manager's salary, because Microsoft gonna Microsoft, whatever. I want to know the real reason. Why would you ever rewrite working code from scratch if you don't have to?

[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 20 hours ago

Exactly. Full rewrites nearly always end in failure.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably to add something terrible for the user but good for MS. Ad integration? Easier to spy?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's fair, but even with that, it's got to be easier to shove it into existing code. Especially if you're trying to do it in a way that people don't notice!

And actually, the Windows 10 start menu infamously had ads, too. So it can't be that.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could be that refactoring the code for Windows 11 compatibility, and new features, would have been roughly equivalent in effort to rebuilding. If the code has been poked and probed for years already, still follows old patterns, and have devolved into a tightly coupled mess of scattered system dependancies… maybe it just becomes easier to justify rebuilding it as a way of clearing out technical debt?

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

The people responsible only had experience with React, so they rebuilt it using React.

[–] BuckenBerry@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I assume the code was just too old and convoluted to maintain properly. I'm a bad coder so I've definitely redone parts of my scripts from scratch rather than trying to refactor them.

Then again I'm not a small billion dollar indie company who's main focuses are spying on users and helping to commit genocide.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Someone on Microsoft probably needed an excuse for their pay increase.

"I rebuilt/had the idea to rebuilt the taskbar" sounds a lot better to managers than "I maintained the taskbar".

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

There exist some horror stories about the code but I have no idea how to find them.

[–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They let their AI do it for them

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But this was four years ago! Actually it was released four years ago. This decision was almost certainly made before there were widespread code assistance AIs.