this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
441 points (99.6% liked)
Programmer Humor
25755 readers
1506 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That honestly seems like the best way to write
conditionalBaptize
but I still hate it. Probably because IRL you'd just rewrite baptism instead of retrofitting the function with a clever use ofid
.It looks pretty normal to me as a professional Haskeller, though I suppose it's perhaps slightly cleaner to write it as
conditionalBaptize p = fromMaybe p $ baptize p
. It's largely just a matter of taste and I'd accept either version when reviewing an MR.Edit: I just thought of another version that actually is far too clever and shouldn't be used:
conditionalBaptize = ap fromMaybe baptize
, making use of the monad instance for->
. But yeah, don't do this.This is probably an ok use for a GADT. Something like:
Thank you for refactoring baptism. How do we push this to production now?
Hey hey hey, let's start with a PR, we are not savages here aren't we?