Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
view the rest of the comments
Except that will never happen. It's unrealistic. There will still be people who will support them and their policies and will try to defend them and would still vote for them if they represented themselves again. It's best to just kill them.
How is killing them better than just throwing them out of the community or spending the effort to educate their supporters? Also would you personally pull the trigger, potentially more than once, maybe a few hundred times? And where would you draw the line on who to kill? How high has simeone to score in the anati anarchist scale to score to get a death sentence? And who get to decide who should die? How would you organize this in an anarchist way? Like I struggle to see how this is actually the best way when I try to think it through.
For some people, I'd pull the trigger, no doubt.
If you were face to face with Hitler. Wouldn't you pull the trigger? We're living in a time now where that type of character is back. There are some leaders who are responsible for hundreds of thousands of innocent deaths because of their policies and actions. The suffering they've caused is incalculable.
And there are others who just hoard an insane amount of wealth that they won by exploiting people and causing misery. Not only is it incredibly grotesque, but they literally have the power to save the world with all that wealth and not only do they choose not to, but they actively try to make it even worse by enabling the aforementioned leaders, destroying the environment, and continuing to needlessly exploit people. They get no sympathy from me.
It's not asking for sympathy. It's asking to understand that killing them won't fix anything. We are up against ideas. You kill Hitler, someone takes his place. The world isn't being run by great men who we can't do without. It's run by people. Shuffling the names around won't really achieve anything, you need to destroy the thing that is giving them the power. The Ideas inside peoples heads that they need to be governed. As I put very succinctly in another comment. If we can destroy those ideas we don't need to kill anyone as they would be powerless and if we can't killing them won't change anything. In fact it will just allow whoever comes after to use their death as a way to drum up support for wiping you out.
If you want vengeance then lets enact it on this plane of existence, where we know what is happening to them. If you want things to change killing individuals is simply not productive.