this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
559 points (98.4% liked)
People Twitter
8114 readers
1138 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's not actually true. Massie has been working with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) on a house discharge petition that would require the White House to publicly disclose files and information related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. It required 218 signatures in the House to force a vote. With every single Democrat signing the petition, they only needed 6 Republicans. They've got 4.
Massie and a couple other Republicans are on the right side of this, but credit should go to all of the Democrats in the house The vast majority of the House Republicans who have refused to sign it are all protecting Trump and Epstein's other clients.
Massie who was the spearhead for that who is a republican so I don't see what is there to celebrate democrats about.
This is a topic where if republicans say no then the public repercussions for them will be low to none but if a democrat says no then that person will likely be publicly ostracized (unlike the Israel vote where opinion is more divided and more than %50 of democrats happily voted no) and many people would automatically assume that the person is in the list and hence that is why they have voted no. So it is not a big success imo to get democrats on board and not a big sacrifice for a democrat to vote yes for this.
On the other hand, there has been definitely more than 4 republicans who have voiced protests over Epstein files not being released since this ordeal has started. It is again a failure of democrats that they could not help muster two more republican votes for this, if they have even tried that is.
Yet only four signed the petition to force the release. Fuck every other Republican no matter what they say in the the media. Who cares if they voiced protests? Talk is cheap. Sign the petition.
It's a failure of the Democrats that they couldn't force more than four Republicans to sign the petition? In what world are Republican actions the Democrat's fault?
It is their failure that they are only doing the bare minimum they can, that is just saying yes to a republican started motion to release the Epstein files.
It's not a Republican started motion. It's a bi-partisan petition to force a House vote to order the Justice Department to release all the files. Every Democrat in the House has signed on. Only four Republicans have signed on. But somehow to you, that is Democrats doing the bare minimum. What exactly would you be doing in the House Democrat's position? Be precise, please. What exactly would you do?
Thomas Massie by spearheading the petition is putting his ass on the line (unless on some deeper level this is just performative politics with results already predetermined) whereas Ro Khana at worst will get some pats on his back even if they lose. So cosponsoring or signing is not the same level of involvement as a republican masterminding this motion, to start with.
As to the issue of what can be done: At a very basic level, do you really believe that democrats have done a better job of keeping the drumbeat on the Epstein files? I would at best say they might be on par with republicans which is a shameful record given that %100 democrats are apparently for releasing the files where as a much less percent (perhaps %10) of he republicans are openly voicing their support. If 200 democrats create the same amount of noise that 20 republicans do, I have the right to suspect that they are just doing their bare minimum so that they (or their donors) don't get implicated. They should be throwing all they have to identifying and using public and personal pressure points and giving political assurances. They only need two more fucking republicans on board with at least 20 already existing sympathetic to this cause. I don't know what to call this if they can't find something to counter Trump's threats.
On the other hand, it has been ~~nine~~ six months since Trump took office and Massie's was perhaps the only serious attempt to get the files released. Get this, one serious attempt masterminded by a republican, supported by a democrat. Bernie has filed more "Stop Arms Sales to Israel" motions in this period (all btw rejected by more than %70 of democrats and %100 of republicans). I know motions don't mean anything when you don't have majority but it can help keep the public pressure and help sway republicans who are on the fence.
By the way you are reacting to me, I guess that you are imagining I was one of the people who said not to vote for democrats during elections. On the contrary I kept saying the opposite for months on end To me it was a very clear optimization problem with two outcomes one clearly worse than the other. But now the elections are over, democrats should be harshly criticised for their inaptitude or even for their performative politics so people don't have to choose between hell and status quo (which is the pathway to hell) next time.
It's democrats fault for not convincing Republicans that pedos are bad? Lmao