Fuck AI

5268 readers

2290 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

762

Genius (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

nah, training data is not why it answered this (otherwise it would have training data from many different years, way more than of 2025)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's data weights for recency, so after a certain point "next year is 2026" will stop being weighted over "next year is 2027"

It's early in the year, so that threshold wasn't crossed yet.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe it uses the most recent date in the dataset for its reference to datetime?