this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
341 points (99.7% liked)

politics

25518 readers
2539 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s contentious decision to fire the U.S. statistics chief has done little to stem an economic slump, with the latest jobs report showing only 22,000 jobs were added in August - well below expectations. One month after Trump sacked the Bureau of Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer in response to weak job numbers, the unemployment rate rose to 4.3 per cent, the highest since 2021.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

And that 2200 number got announced after being already cooked by the new replacement management. Imagine what the actual number was.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

5 blow jobs!

That's right, last month we gained 5 blow jobs!

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Everyone in the department has been pretty clear that the director has no real way to influence the numbers. I suppose they could just release a fake document, but that wouldn’t be very tenable in the long term.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Why else would the director be replaced? No other reason seems feasible -- he didn't like the true answer.

[–] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Shooting the messenger has a long, sordid history.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Because he’s an idiot and assumed the next director can make the change.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 10 hours ago

They can push for things like altered definitions and thresholds, etc, even if they're not authorized to pick their own numbers directly, etc.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

What does this really mean though?

The same could be said of any democratic institution, of course the director doesn't have any way to influence the reporting they produce because it's all supposed to be transparent and reliable.

In reality though, in the Trump admin, they can absolutely manipulate the numbers in a myriad of ways.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

That's certainly not going to stop them from trying.