this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
591 points (99.3% liked)

politics

27262 readers
3272 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 106 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (15 children)

Hey, uh, if you're the Governor of the state in which you know there are federal agents committing crimes maybe YOU should do something.

You can literally do the bare minimum. ICE are driving recklessly, trespassing private property of American citizens and businesses, etc. They are doing it constantly. Maybe start there. Can we get the first "ICE agents ticketed for reckless driving" at the very fucking least?

Like, something? You can use your state and city power to at the very least make things inconvenient to them.

I'm so tired of this "they want us to resist so they have a reason to escalate". THEY ARE GOING TO ESCALATE NO MATTER WHAT! That's how we fucking got here!

Seriously. We've got wine moms driving around and using whistles to slow them down and get attention. But the only thing the state governor can do right now is tell people "film the crimes, because we won't do anything about them right now".

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (7 children)

He could deploy the national guard.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Edit: I made the assumption on which person using the national guard commenter was talking about. Should have clarified their pronoun usage before responding. Original below that assumed the "He" referring to Trump.

He's already going to do that! I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. It's like each escalation that occurs we have liberals saying "well, yeah, we didn't do anything to resist and he still escalated; but we should still not resist because then he'll escalate even MORE! Surely, if we keep doing nothing they won't escalate to the next step"

Do people have the memory of a gold fish? What is your line? Like, please write it down so you remember. Because the line has been crossed 100 times already.

There is always another step of escalation. Pointing to it, in fear, as a reason to do nothing is what you are doing.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 5 points 3 days ago

When is he going to do that?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)