Political Discussion and Commentary
A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!
The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.
Content Rules:
- Self posts preferred.
- Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
- No spam or self promotion.
- Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.
Commentary Rules
- Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
- Stay on topic.
- Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
- Provide credible sources whenever possible.
- Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
- Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
- Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).
Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.
Partnered Communities:
• Politics
• Science
view the rest of the comments
It's going to take repealing the taft hartley act before labor unions can do anything like that. Any union endorsement of these actions would see them buried in lawsuits and the leadership sent to jail. That's why these general strikes movements use lots of language saying it's an individual choice or individual action to participate.
Most Americans aren't in unions, any action we take would be individual participation. I think most of us are angry enough about what's happening to at least do a slowdown strike
You are missing the point. strikes require central organising and funds to last for any significant duration. especially in a country where most people are one missed paycheck from being unable to eat or pay rent.
Also the taft hartley act is directly responsible for dwindling union membership in the states since it makes typical union activities in we see in every other "developed" nation illegal.
This is why I think we should do a slowdown. In a slowdown we're still drawing paychecks, we don't need the union funds. Political strikes and general strikes aren't legal here at all whereas a slowdown might be a natural outgrowth of the stress we're feeling about ice, the economy, govt pedos, etc
When your employer can fire you for any non-protected (and protection is basically nonexistent) reason I feel like even the suspicion that someone is doing a slowdown will get them fired.
This is true of you are the only person doing it. But if it's nationwide with high participation that becomes less likely. That's one of the things I like about a slowdown, it's something that can pick up steam and become more intense. Slowdowns and general strikes have been used in the past by labor organizers and I don't think it being illegal should stop us. The shitty labor laws we have aren't going anywhere unless labor stands up to the people who own this country