this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
152 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25566 readers
3147 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“I’m not sure this is legal to be teaching,” the student says. “According to our president, there’s only two genders and he said he would be freezing agencies’ funding programs that promote gender ideology. And this also very much goes against, not only myself but a lot of people’s religious beliefs.”

...

“It is unacceptable for A&M system faculty to push a political agenda,” Glenn Hegar, the school’s chancellor, said in a statement. “Early investigations appear to indicate this course failed to comply with clear instructions to align course descriptions with course materials.”

Texas A&M passed an audit earlier this year to ensure that the school complies with a new state law banning DEI in public universities, according to the Battalion, the student newspaper.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Conservatives get that. They just don’t like it.

I think the elitists don't like it, for the underclass.

The bottom tier seem to think that school is bad as a general rule, but if you have to go, you should be taught out of "the" Bible for anything that's not part of what is meant as a trade school curriculum. Or that it should be 100% trade school and nothing else, since getting a job is the only reason to go to university, in their minds.

The elitists probably would accept a truly liberal education for themselves and their children - they just don't want most Americans to have broader minds, because those might be a bit too unruly to manage...

[–] Frenchys_prospecting@aussie.zone 3 points 20 hours ago

What they truly don't get is if the playing field was more even ie; livable wages, 4 day work week, cost of living coming down and universal health and education and taking money out of politics then most of us couldn't care how wealthy these individuals become.

Live and let live and it will all balance out but it's their greed. Greed truly is our evolutionary dead end

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The bottom tier seem to think that school is bad as a general rule

They think they're rooting out all the Secret Marxists that they've been told are littering academia, certainly. But A&M is about as well-regarded among Christian Conservatives in Texas as any state school.

The elitists probably would accept a truly liberal education for themselves and their children

I don't think anyone in Greg Abbott's inner circle wants their children to know about the sociology of the LGBTQ community, except as some kind of alien satanic threat to be exterminated.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

To clarify when I talk about a "liberal education" I mean that in the broadest sense possible, not necessarily about identity politics, although it'd be fine if that were a component of a larger picture.

I mean someone coming out being able to spot logical fallacies, have a real media literacy and capable of being an autodidact.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

I don’t think anyone in Greg Abbott’s inner circle wants their children to know about the sociology of the LGBTQ community, except as some kind of alien satanic threat to be exterminated.

I would buy that some true believers might feel that way, but I think most elitists (not sure Abbott is in that upper echelon and I don't know how much xtianist horseshit he personally believes.) would assume it's okay for themselves to have a broader view (if only to reject it), but they don't want the peasants to get any uppity notions...

So, for instance, you see Harvard grads like Ted Cruz, Romney, Cotton, DeSantis...W went to Yale, and so on.

I view it the same way the business class view something like WSJ - they need to see the unvarnished truth about things to really be captains of industry. Hiding things because they are politically incorrect is not going to be helpful for them.

That's the way today's elites mostly view education - they probably want a return to where it was only the aristocrats that had any (useful, meaning liberal, in every sense of that word) education, and sure, the peasants can get "educated" in a trade so they are useful to the moneyed elite as slave wages, but have no notions of changing anything about their station in life...if they can expunge any and all liberal (again, not necessarily politically liberal) things from universities, that'd be exactly what they want.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

It's easier to fear people you know nothing about. Ignorance fuels the engine of fascism.