this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
100 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11282 readers
981 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No problem, boot them out of the country and nationalize their factories. About time Canada took charge of car production and reduced its reliance on the USA and crappy multi-national car makers.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I love the vibe but we would have to address the legalities. Once that is done we would also have to come to grips with foreign investment drying up. I say we can do it, but nobody, including yourself, would be willing to accept the resulting standard of living. I'm not sure how we get from under the current system but we should be pursuing that at every turn.

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This implies most people will roll over and accept corporate fascism and foreign control to maintain their standard of living. Which is not necessarily false. But is that what you believe?

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Unfortunately I do. I'm not sure what else to say. I've written a sentence and then deleted three times. I appreciate that it sounds defeatist and that's not what I believe. I just see too many people complaining about situations they say need fixing without any mention of how they think that can happen. Many of the fixes would be detrimental the the economy because that is ultimately the problem in the first place, that we rely so heavily on it's structure. There are hundreds of approaches to the thousands of issues we face but if you tried to run for government outlining the hard fixes to pursue, you would be run out of town. I for one plan to be run out of town pretty soon, as soon as my domestic circumstances allow me the freedom to "kick bubble gum and chew ass". God I laughed at that South Park line.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I know, I know it would not be simple or necessarily beneficial in the short-term or maybe even the long-term. However, I'm tired of corporations being given all the rights of people, but never being treated like people in the legal system.

A person skips a mandatory court appearance, or fails to comply with a court order? Contempt charges, and jail until they comply. We need to do the equivalent to corporations.

Corporate equivalent? I dunno -- freeze their assets immediately and embargo all sales activity until they comply.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I've been thinking for years that if we're going to keep that corporate definition then we should designate that the entity is represented by the members of the boards. Any judgement leveled against the corporation would be applied to each board member in kind. I'm thinking more of the jail side than the fine side.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the link but I don't have the cognitive capacity to comprehend the meaning anymore. Suffice it to say that no matter what our laws it would be a long court battle. Let's gooooo.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well that hardly helps Canada.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right, whereas kowtowing to American car companies is turning out to be great for Canada.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Totally. Your sarcasm was better than mine.

But, in all fairness, we made deals before America speed-ran the fall of its own empire. We are still coming to terms with the idea that it's not going back to the way it was, like the stages of grief.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Uh... at every court hearing say that we are facing "technical difficulties" and are indefinitely postponing your court date.

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nationalize their factories?

What product would we build in these nationalized factory?

Where would the parts come from?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago

Just do it. We'll figure out all that shit later. Are you a Canadian or a Can'tnadian? /s

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trains. Let's build trains and reduce our reliance on cars.

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wo were are just nationalizing the building? You can't use an automotive factory to build trains.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Stop being so defeatist lol

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Uh what?

You need a train factory to build trains. You need an automotive supply chain to build cars.

Stop being so simple-minded. You need to have knowledge of things if you're going to state opinions about them.

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

First step is you use your fucking brain and build a supply chain.

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apparently for you the first step is to empty your mind.

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Sure thing bud.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 months ago

When we have important meetings at work, we set everything up ahead of time. We test the connection. We make sure EVERYTHING is ready in advance.

Then if things fall apart so badly that it can't be fixed on the spot, SOMEONE WITH A FRICKIN' CELL PHONE CAN CALL!

There is no excuse for this - none. It was deliberate and dismissive.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 26 points 2 months ago

And this is why bribing foreign companies to set up shop here was a bad idea from the outset: they have no respect for us whatsoever.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 21 points 2 months ago

Reading the article, that sounds a lot like: "The dog ate my homework."

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 months ago

How about we make them physically attend?

Fuck stellantis.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Mr. Speaker should be able to get this Stellantis exec on speakerphone.