this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
566 points (98.3% liked)

Selfhosted

53386 readers
168 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Plex is starting to enforce its new rules, which prevent users from remotely accessing a personal media server without a subscription fee.

If anyone needs it: https://jellyfin.org/

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago

Enshittification intensifies

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Plex is not free. Plex is paid software, just like Google Photos or iCloud. The only free software is open source. Open source everything. Doesn’t matter if the client is open source. If the server isn’t, it’s not open source. (I’M LOOKING AT YOU, SNAP!)

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately this idea that open source is free is a bit toxic in a way. It's definitely not free to make, it takes years of dev time, and sure, those people often do it without any compensation. And therein lies the problem. People here bitching about jellyfin not doing x or y, but doing nothing to support full time development of it's creation, then shitting on the devs for not having a perfect product, leads to good devs leaving OSS behind.

Edit: I'll also say, I get the issues that come with proprietary software in the modern age, especially anything online, but there's almost this push towards not paying for software. Because some software is free and open source, paying for closed source software makes you a rube or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] littleomid@feddit.org 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Am I the only one who thinks jellyfin is not only superior to pure, but also way more intuitive to setup? I still don’t understand how plexs routing works, and why I need a central account in order to connect to my own server.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Is it more intuitive to set up for remote streaming to friends...? That's the use case here and as far as I know the answer is a big "no".

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] fluffy@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Probably not the only one, but configuring your server for outside access is way easier with Plex.

Since I mainly use these services for streaming my music collection (long time cd collector), I declare that Plexamp is simply superior to jellyfin. It is really awesome and feature-rich and jellyfin does not even come close to Plexamp regarding music in my opinion.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Anybody still using Plex kind of deserves what they get at this point. They've been announcing these anti-consumer "features" for a while now.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

People don’t deserve to be mistreated but it is surprising that folks haven’t abandoned it if they’re so actively anti consumer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] de_lancre@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Two years ago, when I found out that you need damn subscription, to watch YOUR stuff with transcoding on your device in local network, from your local server - I complained on reddit and a lot of people was disagree with me for harsh position.

They_got_what they_focking_deserve.png

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol, guess who just made themselves a target. They are now profiting directly on people who stream content they don't own from other people's servers. Plex is going to go down when Hollywood sues them.

[–] nixon@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I believe if the server hosting the content has a plex pass then end users are allowed to stream from it without any additional subscription or membership. At least that is how it was several months ago when they announced this.

But you are right, even with the above being true, there will still be a non-insignificant portion of users paying to stream from servers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Jellyfin users, how is the transcoding situation? I have a mix of AV1 and H265 and I need to get smooth playback to my living room Apple TV for families’ sake.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

All dependent on the hardware you run the server on. Give it a good GPU and you're off to the races

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’ve never used jellyfin, but do they also host proxy servers? AFAIK plex does and its costing them money, hence the need for paywalling this. You can still use tailscale and reverse proxy to allow remote streaming

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

You can still use tailscale and reverse proxy to allow remote streaming

I used to use Plex and when I discovered there was paid remote streaming function - that goes through their servers - my reactions were "Haha, no"* and checking whether my existing WireGuard setup would do it instead.

Whaddya know, remote streaming using Plex and PlexAmp at no cost.


*Not because I begrudge them recouping costs, but because it's designed that way to justify charging for it, gives them whatever information they want from my viewing, and it's not self-hosting if there's any third party cloud/account component to it.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Jellyfin does not host anything. With this change free Plex users behind a reverse proxy (or VPN) and Jellyfin users behind a reverse proxy (or VPN) work the same for remote access.

The only difference is that Plex no longer provides expensive services for free, while Jellyfin never provided them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›