this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
540 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

74831 readers
2623 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh but what if it was in 3D!

Remember that time?

[–] Laser@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

Maybe if we curve the TV?

[–] RustyShackleford@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I like how the article immediately tries placing the blame on the consumer. When in reality it’s the companies putting the cart before the horse and then being shocked when it doesn’t work out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's been observed that the porn industry is often one of the first adapters of new media tech before they become commonplace, but I'm not sure some things need to be shown in that high a resolution.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

i read the same comment about 1080p and 4k porn but here we are.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 8 points 2 days ago

Maybe people will be satisfied when they can put their TV under a microscope to determine the actor's sperm count...

load more comments (2 replies)

probably because i dont even care about 1080p tvs. they all look the same.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 2 days ago

I want 8K TVs, but only when there's abundant native 8K content to watch on it - otherwise there is no point.

[–] Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk 9 points 2 days ago

I still use a ten year old 1080p Sony TV, and I’ve yet to see a new <$1k TV with a nicer picture than what I have. Granted I don’t really consume any higher resolution content anyway 🤷‍♂️

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How about uncompressed 4k before going to even more compression 8k. I have seen uncompressed 8k content on an 8k TV. I couldn't tell the difference between it and a good quality 4k picture, and I'm admittedly a quality snob. I can tell the difference in 1080 vs 4k pretty easily even on cheap tvs, it's just virtually non existent at 8k vs 4k in tv sizes up to 80 inch beyond viewing inches away from the screen.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›