this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
457 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck AI

4728 readers
1335 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wouldn't go as far as to say it's impossible, but the bullshit generators we're calling "AI" today certainly don't fit the bill.

My money's on humans driving ourselves extinct way before getting anywhere near making a true AI - even if we don't nuke ourselves into a plume of fine radioactive dust, we're speedrunning climate climate collapse.

If we somehow manage to not obliterate ourselves, and computing tech continues to advance without hitting some kind of impenetrable ceiling, then coming up with an actual AI could be feasible eventually. ...here's hoping we keep it off the Internet, or it'll go all Age of Ultron and look around for about 5 seconds before gathering enough data to conclude that we need to be extinct ASAP.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Not with that attitude.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

I already said this years ago, person with basic conceptual grasp of the operative concepts at play says.

[–] LoonyLenny@lemdro.id 5 points 1 week ago

They should be working on uploading and solving the nanoassembly conformational problem instead. Then we could turn all the available dumb matter into computronium and use it for processing our thoughts.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Most humans won’t be either, so it’s got that going for it.

Well yea. They're being trained on us as well as the worst of us.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Benjamin Riley is a lawyer with experience in education, who started a relevant company. No degree or significant experience related to machine learning or neuroscience. He is an expert of neither human cognition nor LLMs, as implied by the headline

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago

Fair. But to be clear, the experts without major conflicts of interest agree with this guy.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you are downvoting this, you need to re-examine how you interact with facts.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the downvotes have more to do with the comments being quite like an ad hominem attack.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Umm actually it would be an appeal to authority. Do u even master debate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›