this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
779 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
2446 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (9 children)

they still said that they love Google and use all of its products — they just didn’t expect it to release a program that can make a massive error such as this, especially because of its countless engineers and the billions of dollars it has poured into AI development.

I honestly don't understand how someone can exist on the modern Internet and hold this view of a company like Google.

How? How?

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I can't say much because of the NDA's involved, but my wife's company is in a project partnership with Google. She works in a very public facing aspect of the project.

When Google first came on board, she was expecting to see quality people who were locked in and knew what they were doing.

Instead she has seen terrible decision making (like "How the fuck do they still exist as company" bad decision making) and an over abundant reliance on using their name to pressure people into giving Google more than they should.

I remember when their motto was "Don't be evil". They are the very essence of sociopathic predatory capitalism.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 14 points 3 days ago

Companies fill up with idiots and parasites. People who are adept at thriving in the role without actually producing value. Google is no exception.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DOPdan@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (5 children)

"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago

It was already bad enough when people copied code from interwebs without understanding anything about it.

But now these companies are pushing tools that have permissions over users whole drive and users are using it like they've got a skill up than the rest.

This is being dumb with less steps to ruin your code, or in some case, the whole system.

[–] MolochHorridus@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Why the hell would anybody give an AI access to their full hard drive?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like a catastrophic success to me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

why the hell aren't people running this shit in isolated containers?

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Because people who runs this shit precisely don't know what containers, scope, permissions, etc are. That's exactly the audience.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 19 points 3 days ago

Without permission? "I don't know what I'm doing, you do it" sounds a lot like permission.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Constellation@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

i really, really don't understand how this could happen. And how anyone would even want to enable the agent to perform actions without approval. Even in my previous work as a senior software developer, i never pushed any changes, never ran any command on non-disposable hardware, without having someone else double check it. why would you want to disable that?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have no experience with this ide but I see on the posted log on Reddit that the LLM is talking about a "step 620" - like this is hundreds of queries away from the initial one? The context must have been massive, usually after this many subsequent queries they start to hallucinating hardly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No one ever claimed, that "artificial intelligence" would indeed be intelligent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 14 points 3 days ago

And despite the catastrophic failure, they still said that they love Google and use all of its products — they just didn’t expect it to release a program that can make a massive error such as this

Greetings from Darwin.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Lmfao these agentic editors are like giving root access to a college undergrad who thinks he’s way smarter than he actually is on a production server. With predictably similar results.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›