this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
298 points (99.3% liked)

politics

26675 readers
2135 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican lawmakers have unveiled a bill to authorize $901 billion in military spending for the next fiscal year. House Speaker Mike Johnson says the National Defense Authorization Act would “ensure our military forces remain the most lethal in the world.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Record levels of military spending while the administration is openly blowing up the procurement process to grab fistfuls of cash from the procurement of stuff we neither want nor need.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Nor will receive

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 138 points 3 days ago (3 children)

While we close schools and hospitals due to lack of funds

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago

Well, we also funded ICE a few multiples more...

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago

That is actually a recruiting tactic.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Why would we need schools and hospitals when we're trying to build military bases and detention camps?

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 82 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The same military forces you plan on using against American citizens?

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, they might use them against Canada and Mexico first...

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Don't forget about Greenland! We have to go help them answer correctly on their referendum.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The US is gearing up for World War III. And it looks like they're planning on starting it.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 16 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I wish this didn't sound so true 😔 we will never have peace in our lifetimes. It'll take 100s more miserable years, and we will likely trigger an apocalypse before we make it better.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Maybe it's time for the crows to have their shot as the dominant species.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Better protect the shithole from… I don’t even know what. The threat is inside the White House, so maybe take that out and save like $900 Billion.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 18 points 3 days ago

Seriously. Russians don't need to invade US, they're dissecting it from within

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

At the same time, Pete Hegseth is telling soldiers to ignore military law, as the stacked supreme court is trying to force ninth circuits to accept vague and unspecified law changes that allow the executive body to define crime and punishment as they see fit.

I.e centralization of the powers into the white house, distorting the rule of law and preparing to weaponize the army against Americans. If they succeed, Americans can say goodbye to their democracy and hello to their new God emperor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just in time to invade Venezuela for literally no reason

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean they have tons of reasons. Just None they can say outloud.

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Millions of barrels of reasons....

Largest deposit of reasons in the world actually.....

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't honestly think it's oil, it's rare earths we already have oil deposits larger then we can refine locally we don't particularly need their. What we don't have is rare earths, the oil is just a fun bonus to them.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Lol one word. Greed.

But there are tons of other reasons as well. Imperialism, anti communist, "the war on drugs", they hate brown people, etc. Pick one and I bet there's a billionaire pushing for this. If we control 2 of the top five oil deposits that's a win by it's self regardless of we take it out of the ground.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Don't forget invading blue cities

[–] flamiera@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 3 days ago

War-Mongering Republicans, everybody.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 12 points 3 days ago (15 children)

700 billion of that goes to contractors related to Trump

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

“ensure our military forces remain the most lethal in the world.”

List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft (2020–present)

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does this mean the Kids in Mississippi get three meals a day finally?

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you mean the 18year olds enlisted with the military, then yes!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Those fishing boats aren't going to blow themselves up.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

American citizens sit by and allow this shit to happen.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What would you like me to do? I am one person. I go to protest and call my congressman who is a MAGA. Outside of any metro area it is a sea of fundamentalisms and meth. One third of this country is violently MAGA, a third does not seem to care, and my third is trying but we seem to be drowned out. There are people fighting in legal ways for now. I don't know what it will take to get the sleeping third to wake up. Call me a coward if you like but there will be no shot heard round the world bullshit this time. Just look at what the German people did after Sophie Scholl was executed. Nothing. I guess I just proved your point.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I swear these people are fucking bots and their whole purpose is to drive a wedge. I'm actually seeing a bit of a turn recently on the "America Bad" front, evidenced by an approaching 50/50 split of ups and downs. And I think bot is the best case, because then it's just some keyboard warrior who clearly doesn't understand the situation and parrots some other comments on an article from a biased source that they didn't even bother to read.

Like you, my Congressman is useless. His name is Tom Kean Jr. He's a nepo politician, and as that goes he doesn't deserve to stand in his father's shadow. He's a moderate Republican who is almost impossible to find and takes no stance on anything. We never hear from him. But this district was drawn to mix communities like mine in with communities that vote for him and so here I am.

That more ignorant suggestions (which I don't want to besmirch the OC here, I'm sure they'd go down this path eventually) would have us take up arms against ... whatever. Storm the Capitol, maybe. Any mention of that being stupid is called weak.

So yeah, I'm with you.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

And every Russian supports Putin and every Iranian loves religious rule. What a stupid thing to say.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

American citizens go to work and don't turn on the news. News is for those who can afford to worry.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

More like "Most Americans are so self-absorbed, they can't be bothered until the problems start affecting them directly in their daily lives"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

LOL, "efficiency".

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

Humanity on an iron cross

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

Typical priorities.

load more comments
view more: next ›