Now do one for who has a word for "glove" vs "hand shoe".

Germany not calling them "feet fingers" was unexpected.

Language maps shouldn't be country maps, as language boundaries rarely overlap country borders. And it's also wrong, in Hungarian toe is "lábujj" literally means "footfinger"

So the Flemish part of Belgium has "tenen", which is not toefinger. The french have "orteils", which is also not fingers of the foot( finger is doigt ).

So the map is at least wrong for those two countries.

in French, les orteils but also plenty of slang: les nougats, les arpions, les radis, les haricots...

Nope. In portuguese we do not call the toes "fingers of the feet". In fact we do not have a word for fingers. Or toes.

What we have instead is a word for those little appendages that one can find at the end of one's arms or legs. We call them "dedos". Most of the time we do not feel the need to specify if we are talking about fingers or toes. Context is usually enough to distinguish between the two. But when do have to be specific, we call the fingers "dedos of the hands" and the toes "dedos of the feet".

Now, that may seem weird to some, but to me what is really surprising is that some languages found it necessary to use two words to describe what is essentially the same fucking shit.

French supports both designation.

hungary is the wrong colour too: "lábujj" lit. "footfinger". more confusingly, the middle is "lábfej", which is "foothead"

Hungarian here, we're in the "fingers of the feet" group!

So, Germanic and Uralic languages vs. Latin and Slavic languages.

Where's the "toes of the hand" section?

Why is this a map? Some of these countries have multiple languages, like Switzerland, Belgium, Ireland, Wales, even Spain has Catalonian.

Hungary calls them foot fingers, should be red

In certain Austroasiatic languages, your wrists and ankles are your hand-necks and foot-necks.

i always use this as an example of how deeply the languages we use shape how we understand the world

even the answer to the question "how many fingers do you have?" changes depending on the language, and that's a physical fact that seems to not have any degree of subjectivity to it

In Polish, "ręka" can mean both arm and hand and which one it is is context dependent

False, italian has a word for toe that is separate from the fingers of the feet (alluce)

This unites the Germanic and Uralic languages in by far the most important cultural way.

I don't know much about it, but I suspect this is not far off from being just a map of the 'Germanic" language family.

So, feet fingers, or "feengers"?