Can't they just read them on the Senate floor?
is something actually stopping them or are they just protecting pedophiles while doing a bit of theater about it?
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
269 points (99.3% liked)
politics
25566 readers
3092 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
How DARE Democrats try to hold Rich Child Rapists accountable! PROTECT American Heros! Protect Child Rapists!
-Republicans who show up Armed to Drag Shows!
Release the Trump/Epstein files
Of course they don't want their leader to be exposed, then the grifting will stop and their bank accounts will only double instead of tripling.
I wonder what kind of secret could be so terrifyingly destructive to the things wearing people-skin that keep voting to keep it hidden.
As though it weren't blindingly obvious.
It’s not Trump in the Epstein files. It’s Epstein in the Trump files.
What is their supposed reason for defending a pedo?
Pedos plural, a group that includes a critical mass of both parties and business executives. All the secret society Ivy League ruling class were targeted by Israel's honey pot operation here with Epstein
Because their owners are in it too
They see nothing wrong with rich white guys raping children
There's only one reason - Trump's vengeance.
Fucking pedos. Make them face us and explain why they blocked it. I want to see them squirm.
Thank god they protected child rapists /s
God's will, apparently. Or an absence of.
Yup, this is definitive proof that God doesn't exist.
completely normal behavior
Asked by reporters Wednesday why Democrats had not pushed for disclosure when they controlled the White House, Schumer responded, “It’s become so apparent that they’re lying about it in every different way and the demands of the American people are so great.” “The need is greater than ever now,” he added.
Way to dodge the question, Chuck
"It was my fault, it is my fault, but right now we ought to be blaming someone else."
Of course. The need for ~~Epstein's clients~~ generous donors to help fund the 2028 campaign is "greater than ever now."
wwwhhhhhhyyyyyy aaarrrreeee tttthhhheeeyyyyy eeeeevvvveeennnnn aaalllloowwwweedddd to eeexxiiissstttt
I've said for decades now, in various formats - "no Republican should be allowed into office, on any level".
I would invariably get asked by some Confederate about how much that offends them, because argle bargle freedom and democracy, etc.
My response? What, We, The People don't get to vote on whether they should be permitted into office? These politicians work for US, not the other way around. They are the job applicants, and WE are deciding whether they should be allowed to have the job. They would try to gaslight and pretend I was saying something else, etc.
But that's just it: they don't think We, The People should have a say. That's at the very foundation of movement conservatism. They are elitists and they think special people should be ruling over us, all of them deeply radically right wing. They don't think we should be able to gate-keep their politicians from getting into power in the first place.
Because we let them exist.