this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

25250 readers
1976 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

recession warning signs

It's helpful to remember that a Recession is classically described as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP. It might also be helpful to note that 9% of our GDP is bound up in the Tech Sector and five Big Tech companies make up almost all of that share.

We've been flooding the tech sector with money since COVID and steadily, often rapidly, inflating a debt bubble under all of these big firms. The P/E ratios on these companies - particularly Tesla - are incredibly bad.

This, after a long stretch of promising "automation" and "AI will take all your jobs", then watching the tech sector itself hemorage hundreds of thousands of jobs since the start of the year.

To say we're seeing "warning signs" is an understatement. For Silicon Valley, the only thing keeping a textbook recession at bay is the flood of federal money for security spending. And since that's all going to companies that think they can do their jobs without an actual labor force...

The post-2001 Bush Economy was often called the "Jobless Recovery" because so much of our growth was in financial speculation rather than real economic activity.

I'm not looking forward to what the Trump Era Tech Sector repeat will end up like.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

This, after a long stretch of promising “automation” and “AI will take all your jobs”, then watching the tech sector itself hemorage hundreds of thousands of jobs since the start of the year.

As someone in the tech sector, I have a feeling a lot of those jobs never existed at all. It's purely an economy of bullshit. And I'm not even talking about Google employing "the best and the brightest" to slightly change the Youtube UI every quarter or rewrite something in a new framework with zero improvement. I'm talking of completely pointless busywork with no actual result.

I think monopolies are what led to this, Wall Street and Big Tech stifled innovation since nobody could make their own Google anymore, the best to hope for was to be acquired by Google. The only way to make a tech company is through VC funding, since otherwise you'll get beaten by competition that doesn't have to show profits for decades, but also if you're on VC money you have to show irrealistic user growth. If you don't want to participate in the cycle of enshittification, your idea will not get made, people can't work on it.

So you end up with 5 companies employing everyone while doing less and less, and AI can "automate" so much because in a lot of these jobs nobody would notice if it didn't get done. Also why a lot of managers wanted RTO, if nobody did busywork, a lot of people would have any work at all. The even bigger problem is CEOs are also stupid, and AI is not actually that much of a breakthrough at automation. So when CEOs downsize and fire people because they have to because AI, they do so pretty much randomly. So you end up with unemployed people and struggling companies.

This is going to be one for the history books.