this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
184 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

40269 readers
608 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

Comcast executives putting themselves on a list

[–] dom@lemmy.ca 107 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

God you people live in an authoritarian wasteland of a country.

How the fuck does the government have this much control over the media?

[–] ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org 70 points 1 day ago

Billionaire oligarchs

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not the government, it's the rich.

[–] RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 21 hours ago

In americas case, these are the exact same people

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

Even worse.

How the fuck does the government have this much control over the media?

wealthy oligarchs purchased the media, and purchased the government. so it's not the government controlling the media directly, it's just that they report to the same boss.

would you like to know more?

[–] Xed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 day ago

billionaires ruined the USA

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 1 day ago

Because the media is owned by the billionaires, which have a vested interest in the current administration's policies

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cos we live in an authoritarian wasteland of a country. Can I come refuge in your country?

[–] dom@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Absolutely. And I shouldn't have used those words, i just got angry

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago

Hey, I don’t blame you at all for using those words, they were honest and quite true. I say way worse about this place on the daily

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago

No, you are absolutely correct. No need to apologize.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 21 hours ago

It may be on display like a baboons ass in the US, but it is also going on where you are. You just aren't seeing it.

Late stage capitalism gone oligarchy

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago

Just to be sure I have this nailed down, I could use some acknowledgment from someone else’s perspective. A view I may not be entirely familiar with. Soooo, a champion for free speech and an advanced mindset is perhaps rolling delightfully in his pre grave state just knowing how much bullshit he created IRL is following him to the grave. Bighead Biggums was a waste of perfectly fine semen.

by wrong thing i assume they mean don't point out charlie's history of white supremacy and antisemitism?

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 77 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In it, the executives eulogize Kirk, calling him an “advocate for open debate, whose faith was important to him.”

Open debate is good. Now, never bring up and debate any position held by this man.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't think that guy did open debates, I think he was a malevolent well poisoner.
Who used the artifice of "debating" to peddle his lies and deceive the masses.
His "debating" is what pseudoscience is to science.

[–] degen@midwest.social 13 points 1 day ago

None of them do. They just edit things down to the very few moments that make them look like they're winning a debate, and even those moments are superficial, construed, or they don't know that they're actually losing. If it's live or in person, conflicting views and evidence are avoided or just ignored. They're all snakes as if snakes were made of slime.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, seeing some of his clips, so many of his statements are co fidently asserting whatever feels right to him, never with anything solid to back it up. Fucking snowflakes and their feelings...

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 day ago

The last two days have been a fucking joke

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago

the wrong thing

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 40 points 1 day ago

I don't work for Comcast and I never will, so let me say this for all of the affected workers:

Fuck him. I will not mourn him. He registers as nothing more than a statistic to me. I'd much rather spend my time mourning children getting mowed down at school than him.

Anyway, hope that gives the workers some relief.

[–] Highlandcow@feddit.uk 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think this is just an issue with how monopolised mainstream media is

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

mainstream media journalists just let their brain turn to mush by relying on twitter.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago

It's a fair sight more complicated than that. Twitter was a terrible development for journalism, but laying off or buying out anyone experienced is far more the root cause, in addition to corporate control tightening.

[–] Highlandcow@feddit.uk 1 points 23 hours ago

Fair lol I don't trust journos much

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A farce with lots of nukes, mkay

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

Freedom of speech my ass. America is completely and utterly fucked beyond repair at this point.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 14 points 1 day ago

they’re terrified people might learn something from this.

[–] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was frustrated that Canadian news outlets were downplaying who he really was. They're also saying people who are celebrating his death should be ashamed.

He contributed to death, ignorance, misinfo, and leading youth into the alt right pipeline. People should be able to participate in politics without risk of their life.

People should also participate in good faith and shouldn't be allowed to lie or steal. In a just system, these people would be held accountable by the courts. People also should not be allowed to advocate for things that directly or indirectly cause hatred, racism, discrimination, etc.

I don't feel ashamed for feeling okay with this situation. At most, I feel bad for his kids, but I felt bad for them regardless of this situation.

Idk man. It's dumb

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 3 points 15 hours ago

Same here in Australia.

And what really gets to me is that he was not only a cunt. He was a completely irrelevant cunt to Australia. Why the fuck the media here is eulogising him is just plain fucking stupid. I think there’s still too many Australian journalists clinging to their blue ticks on mecha-hitler world, thinking they are swimming against the toxicity and not realising it’s sinking in, as it was meant to.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

I hope everyone publicly expresses support for the kids shot in Evergreen on the same day while pointedly ignoring Kirk's death. I think that sends a clear message without having to mention Kirk at all.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

I mean, it is fair for the company leadership to decide on what is said through their channels.

I don't really see any issues with them limiting what can be said when representing their company.

However, any coworker should be able to post, comment and like what they want on their own personal social media pages without it affecting their employment.

I remember various attempts by employers to force employees to represent the brand and company at all times, that is just idiotic.

I will only accept that my employer will have me say "no comment" when asked about company opinions or details in my free time.

[–] johannes@lemmy.jhjacobs.nl -3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I don’t mourn his passing, i never liked him. But celebrating his assasination… Yeah, i would fire my employees as well if they did this publicly. I am against the death penalty, and in this case someone gave him the death penalty even without due process. If your value’s are such that you celebrate this, then your values don’t align with mine, and you have no place in my business.

I always thought i was politically left, but seeing the reactions of - not just a few, but a lot of - left wing people makes me wonder if i am indeed left.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm going to guess that you probably aren't part of one of the many groups he actively advocated for violence and hatred against.

I don't celebrate his death, but that a man actively advocating for violence and hate against so many has been silenced.

[–] johannes@lemmy.jhjacobs.nl 1 points 5 hours ago

You’re not that good at guessing. I’m a gay male.

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Even if you don't celebrate his death, calling him a 'divisive figure' shouldn't get you fired

[–] johannes@lemmy.jhjacobs.nl 1 points 5 hours ago

Fair enough.