this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
869 points (99.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

28593 readers
1155 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 139 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] cm0002@infosec.pub 101 points 5 days ago (1 children)

listen here, you little shit

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 53 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Cm0002:

waltzes into chat about deceptive links

clicks a deceptive link

realizes they have been deceived

Cm0002: "No, it is the person who posted the deceptive link who is wrong".

[–] cm0002@infosec.pub 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Lmao, it's less about the deception and more about where it led to 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lukalix98@programming.dev 33 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Jokes on you I saw the ad first.

[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 23 points 5 days ago (3 children)

3/4 of screen space filled with ads, how do you live like this?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Once you see the XcQ it's too late.

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It's true. If you recognize the URL enough to avoid it, then you've been rickrolled without even clicking it. Wirelessly brain rickrolled

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mogranja@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 4 days ago

Exactly what I expected. Thanks for not letting me down.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 55 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 15 points 5 days ago

A very good service by DIE PARTEI

Of course it would be them. Love it. Thanks for the link!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 97 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Looks like it got too creepy for its own good.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 40 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Link shorteners and redirectors, especially new and lesser-known ones tend to get caught in the fray with things like Google Safe Browsing (which FF uses as well) and Smart Screen.

It's because the original/shortened link gets reported and not the real/destination site. Then the domain (of the shortener/redirector) gets flagged, instead of the real site.

This happened to me at work this very week, with a redirector service that's a part of our email security stack. FF and Chrome were both blocking links that were safe, because the redirector service itself was classified as sus.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 21 points 4 days ago
[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 75 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Based on these ads, I do not trust the site anyway.

Sketchy dark pattern ads

Love the concept, though.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 84 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Ad for an ad-blocker. Genius 🤣

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Probably the only ad ever to hit exactly and only the correct target demographic.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Illogicalbit@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 45 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Chaser@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely scary 😬 But link "shortener" may be the wrong name in this case

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don't think it purports to be a shortener, just a susener

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 61 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I totally believe this works, but there's no way I'm clicking on any of those links

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArfArfWoof@europe.pub 54 points 5 days ago

alive internet theory

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Pfft, I got one with TODO_Obfuscate_URL. I wish I saved it.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Congratulations! You've won an iPhone! Click our secure link to claim your prize! We promise this is not a Rip Off!

https://secure.ic6do.com/tRn4TI_ip_grab

EDIT: Please do click the link so my joke can land

EDIT 2: Sorry I'm too much of a wimp to even happy-prank people

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

Lemmy hug of death

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Firefox is not playing around

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 16 points 5 days ago
[–] drkt_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago (6 children)

What even is the point of URL shorteners? I always understood it as a Twitter thing, but I see them more outside of Twitter.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When sharing links with people in places where there’s a character limit or to avoid polluting visuals.

Also, when sharing like orally or showing it to someone else when you have no other way to communicate it: ex, the link of a shared cloud file

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Infuriatingly, URL shortners are often used in QR codes because they have a character limit-ish (longer strings make for more detailed QR codes, which are harder to scan from further away so it's a trade-off). but if the QR points to a shortened link then it's more difficult to assess where a QR code is pointing without blindly following the link.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think sometimes it gives people analytics on how many people click the link when the link is to something they themselves don't control. But I'm not entirely sure if that's a common service shorteners offer.

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 6 points 4 days ago

They also sometimes give you the ability to change what the link points to which is great if you send out a link only to realise it went to the wrong place after the fact.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago

Easier to type when used on posters and other media where you can't simply copypaste

[–] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 6 points 4 days ago
[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I find it handy for writing down a URL on paper

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Paper may be old-fashioned but I need something light for the carrier pigeon

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 days ago
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 10 points 5 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›