this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
350 points (99.7% liked)

Fuck AI

5268 readers
2736 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And you can make them more lopsided! (It was at 95% no when I checked)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 141 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Honestly, I'm surprised. Was expecting something close to 50/50 or maybe 40% yes, 60% no but this is hilarious and heartening:

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 123 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You'd probably get a closer split with the general population, but for a search engine mainly used by privacy-conscious people and those wanting to get away from Google's bullshit, it makes sense.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Honestly, it was probably an ad in disguise. You want AI? We've got it! Don't want that bullshit? That's cool, we're not gonna shove it down your throat.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago

An ad that actually tells you some info after asking for info is honestly refreshing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's a little ironic because all the searches just go through Microslop's bullshit instead. Yes, DuckDuckGo is just Bing wearing a duck hat.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 22 points 4 days ago

Better a proxy for Bing than Bing itself

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Duckduckgo uses multiple search engines and does not just pipe queries into bing

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They sure try to make it sound like that, but I ran a side-by-side comparison with sandboxed Bing and kept getting identical results.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Given that they've been in business for nearly 20 years, maintain their own crawler and have said multiple times they source results from a variety of sources I'd feel incredibly cheated if they were just returning bing results.

Plus I use bing at work and ddg results feel* better.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty much anything feels better than "Binging it," but misleading people for a long time is nothing new.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dont think theyre shipping raw bing results I just tested 5 searches and the 1St page of results was different between ddg and bing. Quite significantly and its jarring how shit bing is.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Notably, it's important to do these in sessions where no tracking cookies are possible.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago

Ah I did not do that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Did my part.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago

Currently same split showing, 96% against, 4% for, but with just over 5400 votes. :)

[–] Coyote_sly@lemmy.world 89 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"We don't all feel the same way about AI."

Literally 95% of users: uh, yeah we kinda do.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Thanks for voting — You’d rather skip AI. With DuckDuckGo, you can, because it’s optional."

It shouldn't even be an option, AI Has no fucking business being shoved into anything. Just stop.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Honestly, this comment and the link to a separate URL specifically for our kind was the first time I have felt negative towards DDG. Clearly whoever wrote that had gone through a couple of passes of softening the language because they were overly defensive toward the no-AI crowd.

Maybe make the 96% crowd the default and the 4% option opt-in.

[–] LovableBastard@slrpnk.net 62 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not sure I’m surprised. Besides the reasons other people mentioned, I think there’s another factor influencing it.

I suspect a lot of “Yes AI” voters are really thinking “well, it’s kinda neat”. But us “No AI” voters are really thinking “HELL NO!!! Under no circumstances do we want AI!”

I’m guessing that makes us a lot more motivated to respond.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To add to that, those saying yes are acting almost materialistically, “why not have more when it’s free”.

I am genuinely curious what percentage of the mainstream population is willing to pay for AI.

Something tells me we are finding out soon.

[–] phaedrus@piefed.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I know several middle school teachers that have been paying for ChatGPT for a couple years now. There are a lot more, I would imagine.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

I thought ai was all free as they grew market share? Just for advanced features?

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago

There are people genuinely believe that they want to handle all personal data to AI and it would be good for them. However, those people tend not to use DDG. So it's self-selecting the audience.

[–] excursion22@piefed.ca 36 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nice. 94-6% now with over 18,000 votes.

Same but at 29k just now

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 days ago

They literally can't help themselves lol

[–] dp@thebrainbin.org 45 points 4 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 40 points 4 days ago

Encase anyone wants the ddg no ai option https://noai.duckduckgo.com/

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It has made my experience with DDG immeasurably worse. It's not necessarily that the results are bad, but the performance impact is completely unacceptable.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Don't use the AI then. That's kind of the point of this poll/marketing-campaign, to show it can easily be turned off for DDG.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 74 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

NoAI should be the default version and the people that want it can go to ai.duckduckgo(.)com

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 19 points 4 days ago

Yeah, absolutely.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Currently the default is the AI being on. It’s why I personally changed search engines for my browser because I don’t want the damn AI

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Same here. I'm using noai.duckduckgo.com as the default address and it's working great for me, should you ever decide to return. Some slop articles get through but not many and now I get no AI images at all as far as I can tell. I also have the huge AI blocklist going so I couldn't tell you which is helping more, but it never stopped the AI images and noai.duckduckgo.com absolutely does.

Some AI pics truly creep me out; it's that uncanny valley thing. For me a hint of it is somehow even worse than having an image that is obviously, overtly AI. It is such a relief to open an image search and not see a bunch of unnatural shite that only puts the hair on the back of my neck up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 6 points 4 days ago (5 children)

That's fair. Just wanted to point it out to the user I replied to, who seemingly still uses it but doesn't realize they don't need to have that worse experience.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 9 points 4 days ago

Ah this warms my heart ❤️

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Remember what you saw before the results will be "fixed".

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

FR I can see the AI Tech Bros working on a bot to submit votes as we speak.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It'll crash all day and probably never work right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Uh-oh, nobody show this to Jensen Huang, it would break his little heart.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 day ago

There's nothing to break in that location.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 14 points 4 days ago

Proud "no" voter chiming in.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 days ago

I don't need a pin. I put my vote in. It's 97-3 now on my screen with 1072 votes in... is lemmy 1% of this sample now?

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago

It's currently at 97% No, because I just visited it to get the link to a No AI DuckDuckGo. As those gassed up LLMs known as "AI" are a blight upon the tech space, so many CEOs are making the world a sloppier place; what's worse some people are buying in to this "AI" nonsense. 🤬

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 7 points 4 days ago

Funny. I just started looking into Kagi because Duck Duck Go's AI results have completely ruined the search engine.

load more comments
view more: next ›