this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

54761 readers
383 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am looking at updating my email stack after a number of years and am wondering what to do for anti-spam. Is Spamassassin still the best option, or is there something better nowadays?

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
IMAP Internet Message Access Protocol for email
LTS Long Term Support software version
SMTP Simple Mail Transfer Protocol

[Thread #1005 for this comm, first seen 17th Jan 2026, 22:05] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 5 points 3 days ago

I switched to rspamd. Its bayesian filter is a little weird. It only started working ok after I found the right amount of mails to feed to it. For some reason it forgot everything if I gave it too many mails. I think it's a Redis thing. No idea. I don't have the brain power to figure it out or write a proper bug report. But I think my Debian version is outdated anyways, so this might be fixed by now.

For my server learning from mails from the last 50 days was the sweet spot. Since then I got no false positives and only the occasional false negative. Exactly how I want my spam filter to be.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I've used SA for over 10 years and am happy with it. It's a bit of a pain to get set up and set to train, but otherwise still works well for me.

I've also heard good things about rspamd but I still haven't even tried it out yet.

[–] snowykitty@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 days ago

unfortunate acronym.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 3 days ago

I'm not really confident in this answer but, "not that I'm aware of".

I use mxroute as a paid / hosted IMAP & SMTP server. They run spam assassin, but it's obviously not trained on my own reports.

I've grown fond of Thunderbird as an email client. It's spam management is clunky but if you spend 15 minutes or so learning how it works, and then train it with both junk and not junk, it works reasonably well.

Sadly, it does occasionally throw a false positive, like maybe twice in the last year it identified a legit email as spam.

So, while I'm running a spam assassin and thunderbird combo, it's really TB that's doing the work because SA is really just filtering the super low hanging fruit.

TB is doing a very respectable job, but needs to be trained.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

I use SpamAssassin. It's fine, but definitely needs training. I might look into migrating to rspamd as it seems better, but I don't have time atm.

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Not that I know of. (But if there is, I'd very much like to learn about that!)