kumi

I do not ask you to read?

So that's the mistake I made and the important part. Thanks for clarifying.

I still feel misled that it's labelled as somehing it isn't ("my reasoning").

It is indeed with the help of llm. But reasoning is still solid and very curated.

It isn't your reasoning and promoting it as such when asking us to read doesn't feel honest at all.

Try answering the questions I asked for yourself and see if anything comes up!

Linux MATE desktop is pretty established and I think has a similar audience. Pretty confusing name choice... "want to install mate on linux? Try linuxmate (no relation)"

BTW are those actually your reasonings on the blog as you say? It reads very LLMy.

What makes you suspect the Nginx config instead of Lemmy? Do you have any failing requests (timeout or statuscode >= 400) in nginx log? What are the failing endpoints?

Both can be true.

I think such character assessment and calling names is unnecessary and off-topic here though. Better engage with substance than judging by vibes and doing ad-hominem.

I guess they now have large enough number of users that it would be wise to shift some focus to supply-chain security from growth-hacking.

This is growing pains.

Cool! Keeping up with platform changes is a challenge for projects like this. I think to be successful beyond initial popularity you need an active community that can do this together. It's draining for just one person - especially once you get big enough that they might actively break things just to mess with your integration. Following maintenance of alternative YouTube clients as well as searx-ng is illustrative.

Not to discourage but be prepared. Best of luck!

https://cadence.moe/blog/2022-09-01-discontinuing-bibliogram

Just to rule it out (wouldn't be the case on default debian):

Is SELinux enabled? sudo getenforce (if command missing or false, it's not your problem here)

You are not running with podman as compose backend? sudo systemctl status podman shouldn't show an active service unless you use it.

It was certainly not intended as a character assessment and it's unfortunate you took it that way. I'm talking about how the release notes (and in passing your post) were written and not about you as a person or maintainer, or even the project itself.

I do hold release notes of a public project with thousands of users to a different standard than anon lemmy.world comments in a feedback thread. Is that interesting or surprising?

I believe there was actionable feedback given. You are of course free to dismiss it.