this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
-54 points (20.0% liked)

politics

25292 readers
3019 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As of right now, Zohran Mamdani is the overwhelming favorite to be elected mayor of New York. Beyond his appeal to many New Yorkers on a variety of issues—most notably his extremely left-leaning policies intended to deal with the issue of affordability—in a race where three other candidates are poised to split the anti-Mamdani vote, his victory is all but assured.

Many major interest groups in New York believe a Mamdani victory would be disastrous. It is almost impossible to find a business leader who thinks Mamdani would not be highly destructive to the interests of the city. Similarly, many Jewish leaders think that a city with the biggest Jewish population outside of Tel Aviv shouldn't have a mayor who still cannot disassociate himself completely from slogans supporting a "global intifada," especially during a time of rising antisemitic incidents.

Moreover, hardly anyone who has expertise in law enforcement and crime reduction believes Mamdani is the best candidate to protect public safety—and for a large proportion of New Yorkers, that issue is right up there with affordability as a top concern.

. . . Tom Rogers is executive chairman of Claigrid, Inc. (the cloud AI grid company), an editor-at-large for Newsweek, the founder of CNBC and a CNBC contributor. He also established MSNBC, is the former CEO of TiVo, a member of Keep Our Republic (an organization dedicated to preserving the nation's democracy). He is also a member of the American Bar Association Task Force on Democracy.

Jesus Fuck. Whatever the fuck NY passes as Democratic is losing its fucking mind. Lol. Cuomo’s money pimps should pay off Adams to not run. Insanity.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

I want Mamdani to win, and I want any Democrat who was trying to block him to lose their jobs.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 days ago

It is almost impossible to find a business leader who thinks Mamdani would not be highly destructive to the interests of the city.

It's impossible to find a business leader who gives a shit about "the interests of the city" at all.

The only thing they care about is their own undeserved privilege. They pretend that that's somehow "the interests of the city" because they're psychopaths, so to them, they are "the city" and nothing and nobody else counts.

And yes - Mamdani is a threat to their undeserved privilege. And that's as it should be.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago

We finally get a true Progressive candidate, and the Establishment Democrats' true colors come out.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah seriously this shows a horrifying degree of brainworms.

Cuomo would be a massive disaster in NYC and Mamdani is a once in a generation firebrand who can actually defend Democratic principles without running away from it like a coward like 99% of elected democrats do.

[–] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mamdani is the next Obama. He's savvy, smart and says all the right things. If he hasn't yet been coopted by the corporatists, he soon will be. I'm just saying manage your expectations.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think AOC is a better point of reference here, while Obama tapped into the same vibe he never had the commitment to progressive policies in the same way.

Of course that is easy to say in retrospect but Obama had a much different trajectory into politics than Mamdani.

I think your warning is good though, as someone who was largely influenced by Bernie Sanders I genuinely find inspiration from his emphasis in his runs for president about it really being about the platform and policies not about Bernie Sanders or any one particular leader.

I am sure being a politician there is a good chance Bernie is narcissistic but I have always believed him when he emphasizes that he is just the guy trying to get the policies, the actually important bit of politics passed, and I took that to heart.

If Mamdani loses it will be dark though, not because I hinge any future on Mamdani winning but rather because of how hopeless it will reveal US politics to already be if he loses to Cuomo or is blatantly thwarted in winning by an immense amount of money hostile to the humanity of the poor and downtrodden of NYC.

That's some corporate & billionaire propaganda right there.

Somebody throw a sandwich at this asshat.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

his extremely left-leaning policies

Which are what?

[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Affordable housing, groceries, and transportation.. What a monster

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Once again, conservatives convincing me I like socialism despite 50 years of telling me that it's bad.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Based on long experience, anything conservatives oppose is probably good for me.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

50? Oh, my sweet, summer child

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Haha.... I only have as many years as I have.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Is that our new "it is what it is"? 🤔😜

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Clearly some sort of hate-filled demented fascist who will round up non-criminals for the alligator camps

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

So much extremism.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 14 points 2 days ago

Newsweek is a rag, and this editor is just another aristocrat with an irrational fear of losing even 1% of his fortune, which of course wouldn't impact his lifestyle in the slightest. What they actually detest with every fiber of their being is being held to account by people they believe are beneath them.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lol. Dafuq outta here. He's the most popular NY candidate in decades.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But iT’s TiMe tO gEt SeRiOuS !!?!

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So get serious about going over to Fox and posting this dumb shit. Have a great time.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You can post on Fox now? Weird.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

Fuck off, shill.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What if I told you I don't want to stop Mamdani? 🤔

I think, even in a 3 way race, either:

Mamdani/Adams/Republican or:
Mamdani/Cuomo/Republican

He's going to be hard to stop. Adams and Cuomo both have too much baggage to be viable candidates, and the Republican is... well... Republican.

The Corporate Democrats will split their vote, the minority Republicans will vote Republican and that's it.

The only way Mamdani loses here is either by cheating, or for the corporate Democrats to pull BOTH Adams and Cuomo and back a new popular candidate without the scumbag history.

But I don't know who could do that, whoever it is would have to do it secure in the knowledge that the only reason they are being elevated is to block Mamdani. Someone like Jon Stewart would get the vote, but doing it to take out Mamdani would make him feel filthy, he'd never do it.

Would fucking over Mamdani make Jon Stewart feel more filthy than pinning a medal on a Nazi? Or how about giving a tongue bath to two war criminals (Hillary and Condoleezza)? Jon Stewart isn't the hero we thought he was.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

he only way Mamdani loses here is either by cheating, or for the corporate Democrats to pull BOTH Adams and Cuomo and back a new popular candidate without the scumbag history.

Or Trump grabs control of NYC and installs one of his idiot stooges in Mamdani's place.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Many major interest groups in New York believe a Mamdani victory would be disastrous

Disastrous for their interests, that is.

Mamdani really should distance himself from the "globalize the intifada" comments -- that is an unveiled call to violence against the international Jewish community -- but in the end I seriously doubt that the Mayor's office will do anything that negatively impacts the Jewish community in NYC. Mamdani is just virtue signaling.

law enforcement and crime reduction

https://www.nyc.gov/site/nypd/news/pr001/crime-down-across-new-york-city-2024-3-662-fewer-crimes

What do they think Mamdani is going to do, exactly?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago

He's already distanced himself from globalise the Intifada, they just keep moving the goalposts on him .

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

“Many”

Like Fox News and their “some people are saying…”