this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
327 points (98.8% liked)

politics

27235 readers
3432 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

More like Epstein is in the Trump files.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 146 points 2 days ago (2 children)

HES IN THE RELEASED FILES GOD DAMNIT

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

Pages and pages of them, and photos and photos too.

fuck

Yeah but you can’t trust anything he says that’s just trump

[–] human@slrpnk.net 71 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

A stunning new poll shows a whopping 71 percent of Americans say President Donald Trump knew about former pal and currently deceased Jeffrey Epstein’s sex crimes against underage girls — and a wide plurality say he was “involved in” those crimes.

So that's 71% that said he broke the law and contributed in some way to the abuse whether by direct action or by not reporting what he knew.

That's actually really high. It would be tough to get 71% of Americans to agree on what day of the week it is.

Edit: Looks like it's a YouGov survey, and the article cites a second YouGov survey as corroboration, so I'm not sure how scientifically rigorous this is.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

I regularly do YouGov serveys and I also believe he's guilty

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 16 points 1 day ago

LOL.

So basically Democrat voters.

Alternative title: "More than half of Americans are idiots"

[–] ScrumpyDumpleskin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

George Carlin - "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that..."

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Only 49%? I guess they only asked half the class?

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

The others might be so deep in their echo chamber that the survey question was the first they ever heard of any Trump involvement

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

35%: “I don’t care. I’d still vote for him again.”

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Anyone else see the headline and think, "Nah, he was 100% involved, where'd they get this halfsies shit?"

It took me a second, ngl.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Not a great number to see.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

New poll: 49% believe in facts

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have them listen to Sascha Riley's interview and repoll them, it will be 100%. Epstein was the middle man, it was Trump's crimes.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

Yup it's more like Epstein is all over the Trump files...

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

That reads like party lines.

Also "currently deceased" is a hell of a way to describe someone.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LOL, it's only at 49%?

And only 71% think he knew? I wonder if that 29% is the Sarah Palin/Nixon Resigning Floor.

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't exactly understand the final reference, but I wonder if it's the same as "30% of Germans still thought they were the good guys after WW2"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I got the Sarah Palin Floor concept from The Professional Left podcast. It's what they call the part of the conservative base that will support Republicans and conservatives no matter what. I think they used this term when Donvict's approval ratings went to 37%.

That number is pretty close to the same polling that Nixon had on the day he resigned - 27%.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

27% is the crazy factor and a rather stable data point. Obama-Keyes is an example.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago

Based on trump math, the pedophile rapist piece of shit is 400% in those files.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So 51% say he wasn’t even involved

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump scored the highest, with 49 percent saying he was involved versus 28 percent who said he wasn’t — a 21-point spread.

I'm guessing 30% are a bunch of NPCs who've never formulated a critical thought in their lives.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, they're the perennial "undecideds" who determine the outcomes of elections & our futures based on nothing more than how tightly their panties are bunched on election day. If it's a good day for them, them maybe their favorite "influencer" at that moment tells them how to vote.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

But we are often told how much we should honor and respect the undecideds because they are not partisan and they are so very principled, etc.

🤮

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Are you not gonna include the 22% who somehow didn’t affirmatively say he wasn’t involved?

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm gonna read the article:

Trump scored the highest, with 49 percent saying he was involved versus 28 percent who said he wasn’t — a 21-point spread.

The remaining option was "not sure" which isn't a definitive statement of involvement either way. That captures people that haven't been paying attention and those who are trying to reconcile contrary information to their echo chambers, but it's not people who said he wasn't involved.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh I don’t give undecideds that kinda benefit of the doubt lmao

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

That doesn't change the reality of the survey and the opinions and understandings of your fellow man.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

51% still in denial